Disenfranchisement, i.e. being legally barred from exercising political rights, is seldom discussed in relation to citizenship, naturalisation and border control policies. This paper takes up the challenge. The focus is on today’s arguably most critical form of disenfranchisement, that of non-nationals, and the exercise of arbitrary power that it embodies. The appearance of disenfranchised masses in contemporary democracies questions the state’s sovereign right to define its people in terms of citizenship policy.

Disenfranchisement As Arbitrary Law-making in Today’s Citizenship and Border Control Policies

MINDUS, Patricia Maria;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Disenfranchisement, i.e. being legally barred from exercising political rights, is seldom discussed in relation to citizenship, naturalisation and border control policies. This paper takes up the challenge. The focus is on today’s arguably most critical form of disenfranchisement, that of non-nationals, and the exercise of arbitrary power that it embodies. The appearance of disenfranchised masses in contemporary democracies questions the state’s sovereign right to define its people in terms of citizenship policy.
2013
2013:1
1
18
Citizenship Policies; Arbitrary Power; Migration; Asylum; Reasonableness of the Law
P.M. Mindus; M. Cuono
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Disenfranchisement As Arbitrary Law-making.doc

Open Access dal 02/12/2015

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 133.5 kB
Formato Microsoft Word
133.5 kB Microsoft Word Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/126640
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact