Abstract Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is one of the growing strategies to overcome the problem of organ shortage. Cardiac death is defined as "irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory function"; the time interval to define irreversibility of cardiac death, the peculiarity of consent, and the framework of end-of-life decision making are the most compelling ethical issues which have been raised with DCD. National protocols that balance medical, ethical, and social issues are mandatory to guide transplant care professionals. In Italy, the 20 min cardiac arrest demonstrated by continuous electrocardiography recording is the time interval necessary for death diagnosis based on cardiopulmonary criteria. This time negatively affects donation after cardiac death because warm ischemic time (WIT) - the most important predictor of grafts' poor outcome - is prolonged. However, this time seems to be prudential to define the irreversibility of death and to respect the "dead donor rule", as established by the National Committee of Bioethics. National reference protocols regulating DCD practice are therefore a compelling issue.

Donation after cardiac death: is a "paradigm shift" feasible in Italy?

FANELLI, VITO;MASCIA, Luciana
2013-01-01

Abstract

Abstract Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is one of the growing strategies to overcome the problem of organ shortage. Cardiac death is defined as "irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory function"; the time interval to define irreversibility of cardiac death, the peculiarity of consent, and the framework of end-of-life decision making are the most compelling ethical issues which have been raised with DCD. National protocols that balance medical, ethical, and social issues are mandatory to guide transplant care professionals. In Italy, the 20 min cardiac arrest demonstrated by continuous electrocardiography recording is the time interval necessary for death diagnosis based on cardiopulmonary criteria. This time negatively affects donation after cardiac death because warm ischemic time (WIT) - the most important predictor of grafts' poor outcome - is prolonged. However, this time seems to be prudential to define the irreversibility of death and to respect the "dead donor rule", as established by the National Committee of Bioethics. National reference protocols regulating DCD practice are therefore a compelling issue.
2013
79
534
540
Fanelli V;Geraci PM;Mascia L
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Fanelli - Donation after cardiac death.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 212.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
212.46 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/130889
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact