Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate multidimensional Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities in subjects with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Method: A semi-structured interview and a set of brief stories were used to investigate different components of the participants’ ToM, namely first- vs. third-person, egocentric vs. allocentric, first- vs. second-order ToM in 22 persons with AUD plus an equal number of healthy controls. Participants were administered the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale (Th.o.m.a.s., Bosco et al., 2009a) and the Strange Stories test (Happé et al., 1999). Results: Persons with AUD performed worse than controls at all ToM dimensions. The patterns of differences between groups varied according to the Th.o.m.a.s. dimension investigated. In particular persons with AUD performed worse at third-person than at first-person ToM, and at the allocentric than at the egocentric perspective. Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that the ability to understand and ascribe mental states is impaired in AUD. Future studies should focus on the relevance of the different ToMimpairments as predictors of treatment outcome in alcoholism, and on the possibility that rehabilitative interventions may be diversified according to ToM assessment.

Theory of Mind Deficit in Subjects with Alcohol Use Disorder: An Analysis of Mindreading Processes

BOSCO, Francesca Marina;CAPOZZI, FRANCESCA;COLLE, Livia;TIRASSA, Maurizio
2014-01-01

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate multidimensional Theory of Mind (ToM) abilities in subjects with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Method: A semi-structured interview and a set of brief stories were used to investigate different components of the participants’ ToM, namely first- vs. third-person, egocentric vs. allocentric, first- vs. second-order ToM in 22 persons with AUD plus an equal number of healthy controls. Participants were administered the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale (Th.o.m.a.s., Bosco et al., 2009a) and the Strange Stories test (Happé et al., 1999). Results: Persons with AUD performed worse than controls at all ToM dimensions. The patterns of differences between groups varied according to the Th.o.m.a.s. dimension investigated. In particular persons with AUD performed worse at third-person than at first-person ToM, and at the allocentric than at the egocentric perspective. Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that the ability to understand and ascribe mental states is impaired in AUD. Future studies should focus on the relevance of the different ToMimpairments as predictors of treatment outcome in alcoholism, and on the possibility that rehabilitative interventions may be diversified according to ToM assessment.
2014
49
3
299
307
Bosco Francesca Marina; Capozzi Francesca; Colle Livia; Marostica Paolo; Tirassa Maurizio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bosco 2014 - Theory of Mind.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 179.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
179.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
thomas&sent_A&A pdf.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 188.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
188.84 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/139527
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 49
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 47
social impact