o test the in vivo effects (toxicity, completeness of necrosis, dimensions of the lesion) of microwave thermoablation on porcine kidneys, using the Amica Probe v3 (Hospital Service SpA, Aprilia, Italy), in a refrigerated 17-G microwave applicator, that can be used to induce a spherical necrotic area. PATIENTS AND METHODS Six pigs were used; each kidney was treated, with no kidney pedicle clamping, by microwave thermoablation at least in three different zones with different exposure times and power, during open surgery. Twelve kidneys had 32 microwave thermoablations overall. The kidneys were then surgically removed, and necrotic lesions measured and evaluated microscopically. The sphericity index (SI) was also calculated to evaluate lesion reproducibility. Areas of renal tissue that were missed were then microscopically evaluated by NADH in vivo staining. RESULTS In all, 32 thermoablations were applied; the mean (sd) lesion diameter ranged from 1.2 (0.3) to 4.2 (0.1) cm and changed in relation to both power and time of exposure. The 50-W power particularly induced necrotic renal lesions ranging from 1.9 (0.2) to 4.2 (0.1) cm as a function of the time of exposure and the optimal SI (1.04). Pathological evaluation showed no skipped areas in the context of the lesion, or healthy kidney tissue damage close to necrotic lesions. CONCLUSIONS Thermoablation with the Amica probe is safe and showed excellent in vivo effects in this porcine model. Increasing the exposure time at 50 W power could be a useful percutaneous minimally invasive treatment for small solid masses (<4.2 cm), avoiding the risk of missing tumour areas or kidney parenchymal damage from microwave treatment.

In vivo microwave-induced porcine kidney thermoablation: results and perspectives from a pilot study of a new probe

GONTERO, Paolo;
2010-01-01

Abstract

o test the in vivo effects (toxicity, completeness of necrosis, dimensions of the lesion) of microwave thermoablation on porcine kidneys, using the Amica Probe v3 (Hospital Service SpA, Aprilia, Italy), in a refrigerated 17-G microwave applicator, that can be used to induce a spherical necrotic area. PATIENTS AND METHODS Six pigs were used; each kidney was treated, with no kidney pedicle clamping, by microwave thermoablation at least in three different zones with different exposure times and power, during open surgery. Twelve kidneys had 32 microwave thermoablations overall. The kidneys were then surgically removed, and necrotic lesions measured and evaluated microscopically. The sphericity index (SI) was also calculated to evaluate lesion reproducibility. Areas of renal tissue that were missed were then microscopically evaluated by NADH in vivo staining. RESULTS In all, 32 thermoablations were applied; the mean (sd) lesion diameter ranged from 1.2 (0.3) to 4.2 (0.1) cm and changed in relation to both power and time of exposure. The 50-W power particularly induced necrotic renal lesions ranging from 1.9 (0.2) to 4.2 (0.1) cm as a function of the time of exposure and the optimal SI (1.04). Pathological evaluation showed no skipped areas in the context of the lesion, or healthy kidney tissue damage close to necrotic lesions. CONCLUSIONS Thermoablation with the Amica probe is safe and showed excellent in vivo effects in this porcine model. Increasing the exposure time at 50 W power could be a useful percutaneous minimally invasive treatment for small solid masses (<4.2 cm), avoiding the risk of missing tumour areas or kidney parenchymal damage from microwave treatment.
2010
106
11
1817
1821
Bartoletti R; Cai T; Tosoratti N; Amabile C; Crisci A; Tinacci G; Mondaini N; Gontero P; Gelsomino S; Nesi G
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
accesso riservato.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 317.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
317.67 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/145705
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 24
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact