Background: The efficacy and tolerability of the regimen containing paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) in the neo-adjuvant treatment of locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer are unknown. The TIP regimen (TP plus ifosfamide) showed high efficacy but high toxicity and it is used as an internal control. Patients and methods: In all, 154 patients were randomized to TP (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2; n = 80) or TIP (TP + ifosfamide 5 g/m2; n = 74), three cycles, followed by radical surgery. Pathological response to chemotherapy was classified as optimal [no residual tumor (complete response) or residual disease with ≤3 mm stromal invasion (PR1)] or suboptimal response. Results: Patient characteristics (TP/TIP): stage IB2 (56%/64%), IIA (18%/14%), IIB (20%/19%), III–IVA (5%/4%) and median age (42 years/45 years). The optimal response rate in the TP group was 25%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 16% to 37% and 43%, 95% CI = 31% to 55% in the TIP group. Grades 3–4 leukopenia (6%/53%) and neutropenia (26%/76%) were significantly more frequent on TIP. Conclusion: TP performance was below expectation since the lower 95% confidence limit of the optimal response rate failed to reach the prespecified minimum requirement of efficacy, i.e. 22%. The TIP regimen confirmed its activity but was associated with higher haematological toxicity than TP.

A phase II, randomized trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy comparing a three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) versus paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the Snap-02 Italian Collaborative Study

ZOLA, Paolo;
2009-01-01

Abstract

Background: The efficacy and tolerability of the regimen containing paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) in the neo-adjuvant treatment of locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer are unknown. The TIP regimen (TP plus ifosfamide) showed high efficacy but high toxicity and it is used as an internal control. Patients and methods: In all, 154 patients were randomized to TP (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2; n = 80) or TIP (TP + ifosfamide 5 g/m2; n = 74), three cycles, followed by radical surgery. Pathological response to chemotherapy was classified as optimal [no residual tumor (complete response) or residual disease with ≤3 mm stromal invasion (PR1)] or suboptimal response. Results: Patient characteristics (TP/TIP): stage IB2 (56%/64%), IIA (18%/14%), IIB (20%/19%), III–IVA (5%/4%) and median age (42 years/45 years). The optimal response rate in the TP group was 25%, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 16% to 37% and 43%, 95% CI = 31% to 55% in the TIP group. Grades 3–4 leukopenia (6%/53%) and neutropenia (26%/76%) were significantly more frequent on TIP. Conclusion: TP performance was below expectation since the lower 95% confidence limit of the optimal response rate failed to reach the prespecified minimum requirement of efficacy, i.e. 22%. The TIP regimen confirmed its activity but was associated with higher haematological toxicity than TP.
2009
20
4
660
665
cisplatin; ifosfamide; locally advanced cervical carcinoma; neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; paclitaxel
Lissoni AA; Colombo N; Pellegrino A; Parma G; Zola P; Katsaros D; Chiari S; Buda A; Landoni F; Peiretti M; Dell'anna T; Fruscio R; Signorelli M; Grassi R; Floriani I; Torri V; Rulli E.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
lissoni_apahes_2009pdf.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 237.67 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
237.67 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/145979
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 116
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 109
social impact