Since the 1990s, Sunstein, Jolls, and Thaler have questioned the perfect rationality assumption in law and economics (L&E) and introduced a behavioral approach. But Gregory Mitchell has criticized behavioral law and economics (BL&E). He argues that much of the scholarship within the field describes psychological research as if it provides general laws of thought and behavior rather than insights conditional on the setting, on the characteristics of subjects, and on the specificity of the task in hand. Human heterogeneity is not adequately included in models developed under behavioral assumptions of this kind. This paper argues that Mitchell’s work contributes to develop a cognitive approach to Law closer to the cognitive theory of institutions and to the Original Institutional Economics (OIE). Mitchell’s contextualist approach seeks to identify the specific conditions under which irrational behavior occurs and to understand when and how it can be remedied.

Heterogeneity and law: toward a cognitive legal theory

AMBROSINO, Angela
2016-01-01

Abstract

Since the 1990s, Sunstein, Jolls, and Thaler have questioned the perfect rationality assumption in law and economics (L&E) and introduced a behavioral approach. But Gregory Mitchell has criticized behavioral law and economics (BL&E). He argues that much of the scholarship within the field describes psychological research as if it provides general laws of thought and behavior rather than insights conditional on the setting, on the characteristics of subjects, and on the specificity of the task in hand. Human heterogeneity is not adequately included in models developed under behavioral assumptions of this kind. This paper argues that Mitchell’s work contributes to develop a cognitive approach to Law closer to the cognitive theory of institutions and to the Original Institutional Economics (OIE). Mitchell’s contextualist approach seeks to identify the specific conditions under which irrational behavior occurs and to understand when and how it can be remedied.
2016
12
2
417
442
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=JOI
Economics, History of Economic thougt
Ambrosino, Angela
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JOIE Agust2015.pdf

Open Access dal 29/12/2017

Descrizione: post-print
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 377.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
377.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Ambrosino_Heterogeneity_and_law.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 457.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
457.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1535370
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact