This paper analyzes the performance of the Italian defined contribution guaranteed pension funds during the period 2008-2012 through a panel analysis. This period has been very challenging for the guarantors, since it has been characterized by simultaneous systemic shocks to a wide range of asset classes. In such a scenario, we explore the determinants of cross-sectional differences in funds capacity to outperform the guarantees provided and to meet regulatory provisions. In particular, the paper is organized around three main research questions. The first one is focused on the probability of a guarantee payment in a given year. The second research question deals with the determinants of the gap between actual return and minimum guaranteed yield on a yearly basis. The third question explores the capability of the pension funds to meet the objective of a return in line with the level guaranteed by law on the termination indemnity’s contributions. The analysis tests a wide range of variables related to asset allocation, investment style, funds characteristics, markets return and volatility. The outcomes show that the capability in meeting the guarantee commitment is affected by the nature of the fund and the type of investment manager, whereas the impact of asset allocation is less marked, due to high homologation of financial strategies.

Institutional disparities and asset allocation homologation in Italian defined contribution pension funds. How do they affect the guarantee commitment?

DE VINCENTIIS, Paola;ISAIA, Eleonora;ZOCCHI, Paola
2017-01-01

Abstract

This paper analyzes the performance of the Italian defined contribution guaranteed pension funds during the period 2008-2012 through a panel analysis. This period has been very challenging for the guarantors, since it has been characterized by simultaneous systemic shocks to a wide range of asset classes. In such a scenario, we explore the determinants of cross-sectional differences in funds capacity to outperform the guarantees provided and to meet regulatory provisions. In particular, the paper is organized around three main research questions. The first one is focused on the probability of a guarantee payment in a given year. The second research question deals with the determinants of the gap between actual return and minimum guaranteed yield on a yearly basis. The third question explores the capability of the pension funds to meet the objective of a return in line with the level guaranteed by law on the termination indemnity’s contributions. The analysis tests a wide range of variables related to asset allocation, investment style, funds characteristics, markets return and volatility. The outcomes show that the capability in meeting the guarantee commitment is affected by the nature of the fund and the type of investment manager, whereas the impact of asset allocation is less marked, due to high homologation of financial strategies.
2017
16
2
205
232
http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PEF
G23; Finance; Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management; Economics and Econometrics
DE VINCENTIIS, Paola; Isaia, Eleonora; Zocchi, Paola
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Articolo JPEF.PDF

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 334.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
334.61 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
doc4.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 296.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
296.44 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
paper post print.doc.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 351.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
351.06 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1560154
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact