Recent advances in biotechnologies have led to the development of multiplex genomic and proteomic analyses for clinical use. Nevertheless, guidelines are currently lacking to determine which molecular assays should be implemented in metastatic cancers. The first MAP conference was dedicated to exploring the use of genomics to better select therapies in the treatment of metastatic cancers. Sixteen consensus items were covered. There was a consensus that new technologies like next-generation sequencing of tumors and ddPCR on circulating free DNA have convincing analytical validity. Further work needs to be undertaken to establish the clinical utility of liquid biopsies and the added clinical value of expanding from individual gene tests into large gene panels. Experts agreed that standardized bioinformatics methods for biological interpretation of genomic data are needed and that precision medicine trials should be stratified based on the level of evidence available for the genomic alterations identified.

Consensus on precision medicine for metastatic cancers: a report from the MAP conference

BARDELLI, Alberto;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Recent advances in biotechnologies have led to the development of multiplex genomic and proteomic analyses for clinical use. Nevertheless, guidelines are currently lacking to determine which molecular assays should be implemented in metastatic cancers. The first MAP conference was dedicated to exploring the use of genomics to better select therapies in the treatment of metastatic cancers. Sixteen consensus items were covered. There was a consensus that new technologies like next-generation sequencing of tumors and ddPCR on circulating free DNA have convincing analytical validity. Further work needs to be undertaken to establish the clinical utility of liquid biopsies and the added clinical value of expanding from individual gene tests into large gene panels. Experts agreed that standardized bioinformatics methods for biological interpretation of genomic data are needed and that precision medicine trials should be stratified based on the level of evidence available for the genomic alterations identified.
2016
27
8
1443
1448
http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/27/8/1443.long
precision medicine; consensus; biomarkers; CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA; BREAST-CANCER; ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; EGFR BLOCKADE; MUTATIONS; EVOLUTION; GENES; HETEROGENEITY; VALIDATION
Swanton, C; Soria, J-C; Bardelli, A; Biankin, A; Caldas, C; Chandarlapaty, S; de Koning, L; Dive, C; Feunteun, J; Leung, S-Y; Marais, R; Mardis, E R; Mcgranahan, N; Middleton, G; Quezada, S A; Rodón, J; Rosenfeld, N; Sotiriou, C; André, F
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2016-Consensus on precision medicine_post print_4aperto.pdf

Open Access dal 01/10/2017

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 763.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
763.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
2016-Consensus on precision medicine.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 670 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
670 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1621180
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 75
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact