Biological monitoring has the potential to decrease the uncertainty in estimating exposures by conventional methods, to provide biologically relevant measures of exposure, and to determine whether individuals or a population are at increased risk of adverse health effects caused by specific chemicals. Recent developments in system toxicology and "omics" techniques have provided many promising biological markers to assess both local and systemic changes following nanomaterial exposure. In biomarker development, a pragmatic approach is to draw exploratory and candidate biomarkers from other fields of particle and metal toxicology. Since biological monitoring has a different meaning in research and in practice, candidate biomarkers, which are potentially useful for occupational health surveillance, epidemiology and environmental sustainability should meet validity criteria, and thus undergo field validation and assessment of their predictive value toward relevant health outcomes and, ultimately, potential risks associated with nanomaterials. Moreover, biomarkers based on noninvasive methods deserve particular consideration in human biological monitoring.

Biomonitoring

Bergamaschi E;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Biological monitoring has the potential to decrease the uncertainty in estimating exposures by conventional methods, to provide biologically relevant measures of exposure, and to determine whether individuals or a population are at increased risk of adverse health effects caused by specific chemicals. Recent developments in system toxicology and "omics" techniques have provided many promising biological markers to assess both local and systemic changes following nanomaterial exposure. In biomarker development, a pragmatic approach is to draw exploratory and candidate biomarkers from other fields of particle and metal toxicology. Since biological monitoring has a different meaning in research and in practice, candidate biomarkers, which are potentially useful for occupational health surveillance, epidemiology and environmental sustainability should meet validity criteria, and thus undergo field validation and assessment of their predictive value toward relevant health outcomes and, ultimately, potential risks associated with nanomaterials. Moreover, biomarkers based on noninvasive methods deserve particular consideration in human biological monitoring.
2017
Adverse Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials: Exposure, Toxicology, and Impact on Human Health: Second Edition
Fadeel B, Pietroiusti A, Shvedova A.A.
125
158
978-012809199-9
Biomarkers Biomonitoring programs Epigenetic mechanisms Intercellular communication
Bergamaschi, E; Guseva Canu, I; Prina Mello, A; Magrini, A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Chpt 6 BIOMONITORING - ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NANOMATERIALS 2017.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Capitolo di Libro
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 3.96 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.96 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1655484
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact