This study evaluated the effect of a novel formulation for starter culture associated with specific ripening conditions (NoNitTM technology) vs. a commercial» starter on the fate of selected pathogens and hygiene in- dicators during the fermentation and ripening of experimentally spiked salame nostrano (Italian dry sausage). Selected strains of Staphylococcus aureus 27R, Escherichia coli CSH26 K 12, Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 and Salmonella Derby 27 were inoculated into salami batter and challenged with two formulations of starter cultures (a commercial formulation and the NoNitTM formulation, consisting of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis, strain 340; L. lactis ssp. lactis, strain 16; Lactobacillus casei ssp. casei, strain 208 and Enterococcus faecium strain 614) with ripening at a low temperature. The proposed technology (NoNitTM) performed better than the commercial formulation and limited the growth of spiked Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus (including the production of enterotoxin), Salmonella Derby and Listeria innocua, yet maintained the basic product appearance and texture.

Fate of selected pathogens in spiked «SALAME NOSTRANO» produced without added nitrates following the application of NONIT™ technology

Barbera, S.
Last
2018-01-01

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of a novel formulation for starter culture associated with specific ripening conditions (NoNitTM technology) vs. a commercial» starter on the fate of selected pathogens and hygiene in- dicators during the fermentation and ripening of experimentally spiked salame nostrano (Italian dry sausage). Selected strains of Staphylococcus aureus 27R, Escherichia coli CSH26 K 12, Listeria innocua ATCC 33090 and Salmonella Derby 27 were inoculated into salami batter and challenged with two formulations of starter cultures (a commercial formulation and the NoNitTM formulation, consisting of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis, strain 340; L. lactis ssp. lactis, strain 16; Lactobacillus casei ssp. casei, strain 208 and Enterococcus faecium strain 614) with ripening at a low temperature. The proposed technology (NoNitTM) performed better than the commercial formulation and limited the growth of spiked Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus (including the production of enterotoxin), Salmonella Derby and Listeria innocua, yet maintained the basic product appearance and texture.
2018
Inglese
Esperti anonimi
139
247
254
8
http://www.elsevier.com/locate/meatsci
Dry salami; Enterococcus faecium; Lactobacillus casei ssp. casei; Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis; Starter culture; Animals; Bacteria; Enterococcus faecium; Escherichia coli; Fermentation; Food Handling; Lactobacillus casei; Lactococcus lactis; Listeria; Meat Products; Salmonella; Staphylococcus aureus; Swine; Food Microbiology; Food Science
REPUBBLICA SUDAFRICANA
1 – prodotto con file in versione Open Access (allegherò il file al passo 6 - Carica)
262
8
Cenci-Goga, B.T.; Karama, M.; Sechi, P.; Iulietto, M.F.; Grispoldi, L.; Selvaggini, R.; Ceccarelli, M.; Barbera, S.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
partially_open
03-CONTRIBUTO IN RIVISTA::03A-Articolo su Rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BCG18_MS_NoNit_orig.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 414.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
414.93 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
BCG18_MS_NoNit_orig_Table.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Tabelle
Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 667.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
667.93 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
BCG18_MS_NoNit_orig_Figure.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Figure
Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 955.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
955.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Barbera_pdf_ed_1687703.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 462.62 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
462.62 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1687703
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact