Double-sided recommendations (DSR) have been recently introduced for an item and a group that the item is destined for. Herein we present an algorithm which takes inspiration from the Social Comparison Theory to recommend items that had an average positive evaluation from other users on the target user's social network. Other users' judgments are weighted according to the influence these users have on the target. Moreover, for each recommended item, we propose a group that encompasses all the target users' contacts who expressed a positive opinion on it. Our data show that users consider double-sided recommendations more useful than traditional recommendations which provide equivalent information. It was observed that our "social" DSR algorithm performs better in the event recommendation domain than a content-based one which has already been recognised as providing a good performance, in terms of precision, recall, accuracy and F1. This result is strengthened by our demonstrating that the good performance DSRs provide also depends on their peculiar structure and not only on the fact that they include "social" information. The item-recommendation part also performed better than a user-based collaborative filtering algorithm. Lastly, we found that users' scores for recommended item-group packages can be better predicted by considering only the system scores for the recommended groups, at least in the domain of social and cultural events.

What and who with: A social approach to double-sided recommendation

Lombardi, Ilaria;Vernero, Fabiana
2017-01-01

Abstract

Double-sided recommendations (DSR) have been recently introduced for an item and a group that the item is destined for. Herein we present an algorithm which takes inspiration from the Social Comparison Theory to recommend items that had an average positive evaluation from other users on the target user's social network. Other users' judgments are weighted according to the influence these users have on the target. Moreover, for each recommended item, we propose a group that encompasses all the target users' contacts who expressed a positive opinion on it. Our data show that users consider double-sided recommendations more useful than traditional recommendations which provide equivalent information. It was observed that our "social" DSR algorithm performs better in the event recommendation domain than a content-based one which has already been recognised as providing a good performance, in terms of precision, recall, accuracy and F1. This result is strengthened by our demonstrating that the good performance DSRs provide also depends on their peculiar structure and not only on the fact that they include "social" information. The item-recommendation part also performed better than a user-based collaborative filtering algorithm. Lastly, we found that users' scores for recommended item-group packages can be better predicted by considering only the system scores for the recommended groups, at least in the domain of social and cultural events.
2017
101
62
75
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.01.001
Content-based recommendation; Double sided recommendations; Group recommendation; Recommender systems; Social network; User model; Software; Human Factors and Ergonomics; 3304; Engineering (all); Human-Computer Interaction; Hardware and Architecture
Lombardi, Ilaria*; Vernero, Fabiana
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
lombardi_vernero_2017.pdf

Open Access dal 02/06/2019

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 1.48 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.48 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
2017_lombardi_vernero.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 965.74 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
965.74 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1690840
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact