Purpose This paper contributes to the entrepreneurship theory in family firms as it focuses on the relevance of an ambidextrous entrepreneurial strategy (Helfat and Peteraf, 2009) thanks to an effective combination between exploitation and exploration activities. The study refers to the food sector, characterized by established food traditions and changing consumption patterns. Design/methodology/approach After reviewing the topics, we referred to Goel and Jones (2016) for its representativeness for our research. We conducted an explanatory case study in which we identified the framework’s three sub- sytems impacting the above family business systems. The case study is relevant because Eataly, a family-owned and -managed firm, is gaining recognition while applying a strong entrepreneurial strategy and it is unique in the world for the strength of its commercial strategy and dimensions. Findings Entrepreneurship strategies can be explained by combined organisational antecedent conditions, represented by three sub-systems: family, business and ownership. The sub-systems’ features and their interrelations play a relevant role in influencing entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation processes. Research limitations/implications The study contributes to the actual entrepreneurship theory in family firms because it indicates the relevance of an ambidextrous entrepreneurial strategy, thanks to a combination of exploitation and exploration activities. In addition, it analyses the so-called antecedent conditions in organizations to achieve this favourable combination. Limitations involve the case study method and interview technique, both of which could be expanded. Practical implications Several practical implications follow for different stakeholder categories (food sector companies, investors and private/public entities) concerning the management of antecedent conditions, the consequences of entrepreneurial investment policy, and tourism and territorial development. Originality/value This research is novel because it combines an ambidextrous entrepreneurship approach (Goel and Jones, 2016) with the family firm’s sub-systems (Tagiuri and Davis, 1982), observing how these sub-systems are relevant to defining and managing effective entrepreneurship strategy in a family food firm. The value added is particularly relevant in the food sector, which is characterized by low research and development. In addition, it requires innovative approaches to stimulate customers’ perception of market demand, to satisfy their needs and to sustain family firms in a highly competitive environment.

Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation processes of family businesses in the food sector

Culasso F.;Giacosa E.;Stupino M.
2019-01-01

Abstract

Purpose This paper contributes to the entrepreneurship theory in family firms as it focuses on the relevance of an ambidextrous entrepreneurial strategy (Helfat and Peteraf, 2009) thanks to an effective combination between exploitation and exploration activities. The study refers to the food sector, characterized by established food traditions and changing consumption patterns. Design/methodology/approach After reviewing the topics, we referred to Goel and Jones (2016) for its representativeness for our research. We conducted an explanatory case study in which we identified the framework’s three sub- sytems impacting the above family business systems. The case study is relevant because Eataly, a family-owned and -managed firm, is gaining recognition while applying a strong entrepreneurial strategy and it is unique in the world for the strength of its commercial strategy and dimensions. Findings Entrepreneurship strategies can be explained by combined organisational antecedent conditions, represented by three sub-systems: family, business and ownership. The sub-systems’ features and their interrelations play a relevant role in influencing entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation processes. Research limitations/implications The study contributes to the actual entrepreneurship theory in family firms because it indicates the relevance of an ambidextrous entrepreneurial strategy, thanks to a combination of exploitation and exploration activities. In addition, it analyses the so-called antecedent conditions in organizations to achieve this favourable combination. Limitations involve the case study method and interview technique, both of which could be expanded. Practical implications Several practical implications follow for different stakeholder categories (food sector companies, investors and private/public entities) concerning the management of antecedent conditions, the consequences of entrepreneurial investment policy, and tourism and territorial development. Originality/value This research is novel because it combines an ambidextrous entrepreneurship approach (Goel and Jones, 2016) with the family firm’s sub-systems (Tagiuri and Davis, 1982), observing how these sub-systems are relevant to defining and managing effective entrepreneurship strategy in a family food firm. The value added is particularly relevant in the food sector, which is characterized by low research and development. In addition, it requires innovative approaches to stimulate customers’ perception of market demand, to satisfy their needs and to sustain family firms in a highly competitive environment.
2019
-
-
entrepreneurship; entrepreneurial; exploration activities; exploitation activities; family businesses; family sub-system; the business sub-system; the ownership sub-system; food sector
Vrontis D., Culasso F., Giacosa E., Stupino M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10-1108_BFJ-02-2019-0118.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 332.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
332.87 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
culasso_Eataly last version.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 920.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
920.16 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1707073
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 13
social impact