Most people within the third sector and beyond would endorse the view that social economy organisations should report on what they do and how they work for the common good, and we, as society, should require such reporting. There are several studies and research on the role of reporting for social enterprises hoping to communicate financial information and social impact. However, the gap that emerged from the literature is that the principles of transparency and accountability are defined, but there is a lack of determination of a key element that can put order and respond to the need of stakeholders in the best possible way. The authors believe that a good reporting tool that is representative and that above all is understandable even to non-professional users only works if it can give an effective group representation if it puts the first place: the need. The authors employ the methodology of the case study where data are collected by multiple means through qualitative research techniques such as interviews, and document analysis for acquiring a full understanding. The finding reveals that with the focus on need of stakeholders increase accountability, transparency and stakeholder engagement. Stakeholders would be able to better understand the strong values of good governance, leadership, performance and social impact that the company possesses. Through the research project conducted so far has been possible to demonstrate that in social enterprises to have an effective measurement of impact must use all possible tools to know and describe the company and the ecosystem that surrounds it and this is possible through timely reporting that it returns clear information for all.

Reporting tools for social enterprises: between impact measurement and stakeholder needs

IANNACI, DANIEL
2019-01-01

Abstract

Most people within the third sector and beyond would endorse the view that social economy organisations should report on what they do and how they work for the common good, and we, as society, should require such reporting. There are several studies and research on the role of reporting for social enterprises hoping to communicate financial information and social impact. However, the gap that emerged from the literature is that the principles of transparency and accountability are defined, but there is a lack of determination of a key element that can put order and respond to the need of stakeholders in the best possible way. The authors believe that a good reporting tool that is representative and that above all is understandable even to non-professional users only works if it can give an effective group representation if it puts the first place: the need. The authors employ the methodology of the case study where data are collected by multiple means through qualitative research techniques such as interviews, and document analysis for acquiring a full understanding. The finding reveals that with the focus on need of stakeholders increase accountability, transparency and stakeholder engagement. Stakeholders would be able to better understand the strong values of good governance, leadership, performance and social impact that the company possesses. Through the research project conducted so far has been possible to demonstrate that in social enterprises to have an effective measurement of impact must use all possible tools to know and describe the company and the ecosystem that surrounds it and this is possible through timely reporting that it returns clear information for all.
2019
Reporting; social enterprises; social impact; stakeholder needs
Daniel Iannaci
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
78_aidea2019_doctoral-colloquium_FINAL PAPER.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: DEROGA (OBBLIGATORIO ALLEGARE FILE CON MOTIVAZIONE)
Dimensione 266.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
266.77 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1711998
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact