Abstract BACKGROUND: There are few evidences on safety of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), as well as its effects in neurological conditions, including multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of a 2-week CIMT protocol on upper limb activity of progressive MS patients through a three-dimensional (3D) kinematic analysis. METHODS: In this randomized single-blind pilot study, we randomly allocated patients affected by progressive MS reporting a reduced use of one upper limb into two different groups: CIMT group (less affected limb blocked by a splint) and control group (undergoing bi-manual treatment). Primary outcome was CIMT safety. Furthermore, we assessed CIMT effects through clinical outcomes (hand grip strength, HGS, and 9 Hole Peg Test, 9HPT) and 3D kinematic analysis (normalized jerk, number of movement units, going phase duration, mean velocity, endpoint error). All evaluations were performed at baseline (T0) and after 2 weeks of treatment (T1) for both arms in both groups. RESULTS: Ten MS patients, mean aged 51.0±7.7 years, were randomly allocated in the 2 groups. After treatment, no differences were found in the blocked arm. Furthermore, CIMT group showed significant improvements in clinical and kinematic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: CIMT might be considered a safe and effective technique in MS patients.

Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in multiple sclerosis: Safety and three-dimensional kinematic analysis of upper limb activity. A randomized single-blind pilot study

Priano L.;Mauro A.
Last
2019-01-01

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: There are few evidences on safety of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT), as well as its effects in neurological conditions, including multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of a 2-week CIMT protocol on upper limb activity of progressive MS patients through a three-dimensional (3D) kinematic analysis. METHODS: In this randomized single-blind pilot study, we randomly allocated patients affected by progressive MS reporting a reduced use of one upper limb into two different groups: CIMT group (less affected limb blocked by a splint) and control group (undergoing bi-manual treatment). Primary outcome was CIMT safety. Furthermore, we assessed CIMT effects through clinical outcomes (hand grip strength, HGS, and 9 Hole Peg Test, 9HPT) and 3D kinematic analysis (normalized jerk, number of movement units, going phase duration, mean velocity, endpoint error). All evaluations were performed at baseline (T0) and after 2 weeks of treatment (T1) for both arms in both groups. RESULTS: Ten MS patients, mean aged 51.0±7.7 years, were randomly allocated in the 2 groups. After treatment, no differences were found in the blocked arm. Furthermore, CIMT group showed significant improvements in clinical and kinematic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: CIMT might be considered a safe and effective technique in MS patients.
2019
45
2
247
254
www.iospress.nl/site/html/10538135.html
constraint-induced movement therapy; kinematics; Multiple sclerosis; muscle strength; physical therapy modalities; rehabilitation; upper extremity
De Sire A.; Bigoni M.; Priano L.; Baudo S.; Solaro C.; Mauro A.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019_Constraint-induced movement therapy in multiple sclerosis_Neurorehab_POST.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 568.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
568.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1721527
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact