We present the architecture and usability evaluation of virtual reality system—“Positive Bike”—designed for improving cognitive and motor conditions in frail elderly patients. The system consists of a cycle-ergometer integrated in an immersive virtual reality system (CAVE) which allows combining motor and cognitive exercises according to a “dual-task” paradigm. We tested the usability and user’s experience of the prototype in a pilot evaluation study that involved five elderly patients. The prototype was tested in one-session training to understand the limitations and areas for improvement of our system. The evaluation consisted in (i) usability assessment using the system usability scale; (ii) evaluation of user’s engagement using the flow state scale; and (iii) expert evaluation involving interviews with domain experts. Results showed a good usability, both for system usability scale and the semi-structured interview. The level of flow (i.e., enjoyment with the task at hand) measured using the short flow state scale, was also high. Analysis of semi-structured interview carried out with domain experts provided further indications to improve the system. Overall, these findings show that, despite some limitations, the system is usable and provides an enjoyable user’s experience.

Characteristics, usability, and users experience of a system combining cognitive and physical therapy in a virtual environment: Positive bike

Cipresso, Pietro;
2018-01-01

Abstract

We present the architecture and usability evaluation of virtual reality system—“Positive Bike”—designed for improving cognitive and motor conditions in frail elderly patients. The system consists of a cycle-ergometer integrated in an immersive virtual reality system (CAVE) which allows combining motor and cognitive exercises according to a “dual-task” paradigm. We tested the usability and user’s experience of the prototype in a pilot evaluation study that involved five elderly patients. The prototype was tested in one-session training to understand the limitations and areas for improvement of our system. The evaluation consisted in (i) usability assessment using the system usability scale; (ii) evaluation of user’s engagement using the flow state scale; and (iii) expert evaluation involving interviews with domain experts. Results showed a good usability, both for system usability scale and the semi-structured interview. The level of flow (i.e., enjoyment with the task at hand) measured using the short flow state scale, was also high. Analysis of semi-structured interview carried out with domain experts provided further indications to improve the system. Overall, these findings show that, despite some limitations, the system is usable and provides an enjoyable user’s experience.
2018
Inglese
Esperti anonimi
18
7
2343
N/A
14
http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/7/2343/pdf
Ageing; Frailty; Rehabilitation; Usability; UX; Virtual reality; Aged; Aged; 80 and over; Bicycling; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Cognition; Exercise Therapy; User-Computer Interface; Virtual Reality; Analytical Chemistry; Atomic and Molecular Physics; and Optics; Biochemistry; Instrumentation; Electrical and Electronic Engineering
SPAGNA
1 – prodotto con file in versione Open Access (allegherò il file al passo 6 - Carica)
262
15
Pedroli, Elisa; Greci, Luca; Colombo, Desirèe; Serino, Silvia; Cipresso, Pietro; Arlati, Sara; Mondellini, Marta; Boilini, Lorenzo; Giussani, Valentin...espandi
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
open
03-CONTRIBUTO IN RIVISTA::03A-Articolo su Rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
sensors-295642-peer-review.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 796.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
796.28 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1842274
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 31
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 64
social impact