BACKGROUND: The antiepidermal growth factor receptor (antiEGFR) monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab have good clinical activity in about 10% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that is resistant to chemotherapy. The molecular mechanisms underlying clinical response or resistance to these agents are unknown. METHODS: Tumours from 31 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had either an objective response (n=10) or stable disease or progressive disease (n=21) after treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab were screened for genetic changes in EGFR or its immediate intracellular effectors. Specifically, we assessed the EGFR copy number and the mutation profile of the EGFR catalytic domain and of selected exons in KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA. RESULTS: Eight of nine of patients with objective responses who were assessable by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) had an increased EGFR copy number. By contrast, one of 21 non-responders assessable by FISH had an increased EGFR copy number (p<0.0001 for responders vs non-responders, Fisher's exact test). The mutation status of the EGFR catalytic domain and its immediate downstream effectors PIK3CA, KRAS, and BRAF did not correlate with disease response. In colorectal-cancer cell lines, the concentration of cetuximab that completely inhibited proliferation of cells with amplified EGFR copy number did not affect proliferation of cells with unamplified EGFR. INTERPRETATION: We propose that the response to antiEGFR treatment has a genetic basis and suggest that patients might be selected for treatment on the basis of EGFR copy number.

Gene copy number for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and clinical response to antiEGFR treatment in colorectal cancer: a cohort study

DI NICOLANTONIO, Federica;BARDELLI, Alberto
2005-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The antiepidermal growth factor receptor (antiEGFR) monoclonal antibodies cetuximab and panitumumab have good clinical activity in about 10% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that is resistant to chemotherapy. The molecular mechanisms underlying clinical response or resistance to these agents are unknown. METHODS: Tumours from 31 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had either an objective response (n=10) or stable disease or progressive disease (n=21) after treatment with cetuximab or panitumumab were screened for genetic changes in EGFR or its immediate intracellular effectors. Specifically, we assessed the EGFR copy number and the mutation profile of the EGFR catalytic domain and of selected exons in KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA. RESULTS: Eight of nine of patients with objective responses who were assessable by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) had an increased EGFR copy number. By contrast, one of 21 non-responders assessable by FISH had an increased EGFR copy number (p<0.0001 for responders vs non-responders, Fisher's exact test). The mutation status of the EGFR catalytic domain and its immediate downstream effectors PIK3CA, KRAS, and BRAF did not correlate with disease response. In colorectal-cancer cell lines, the concentration of cetuximab that completely inhibited proliferation of cells with amplified EGFR copy number did not affect proliferation of cells with unamplified EGFR. INTERPRETATION: We propose that the response to antiEGFR treatment has a genetic basis and suggest that patients might be selected for treatment on the basis of EGFR copy number.
2005
6
5
279
286
colon cancer; Targeted therapy; EGFR; personalized medicine; predictive markers
MORONI M ;VERONESE S ;BENVENUTI S ;MARRAPESE G ;SARTORE-BIANCHI A ;DI NICOLANTONIO F ;GAMBACORTA M ;SIENA S ;BARDELLI A
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2005-Gene copy number.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 331.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
331.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/31364
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 255
  • Scopus 910
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 835
social impact