BACKGROUND: The role of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (nCPAP) in the management of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is not completely defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of prophylactic nCPAP in infants of 28-31 weeks gestation. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Seventeen Italian neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 230 newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation, not intubated in the delivery room and without major malformations, were randomly assigned to prophylactic or rescue nCPAP. INTERVENTIONS: Prophylactic nCPAP was started within 30 minutes of birth, irrespective of oxygen requirement and clinical status. Rescue nCPAP was started when Fio2 requirement was > 0.4, for more than 30 minutes, to maintain transcutaneous oxygen saturation between 93% and 96%. Exogenous surfactant was given when Fio2 requirement was > 0.4 in nCPAP in the presence of radiological signs of respiratory distress syndrome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point: need for exogenous surfactant. Secondary end points: need for mechanical ventilation and incidence of air leaks. RESULTS: Surfactant was needed by 22.6% in the prophylaxis group and 21.7% in the rescue group. Mechanical ventilation was required by 12.2% in both the prophylaxis and rescue group. The incidence of air leaks was 2.6% in both groups. More than 80% of both groups had received prenatal steroids. CONCLUSIONS: In newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation, there is no greater benefit in giving prophylactic nCPAP than in starting nCPAP when the oxygen requirement increases to a Fio2 > 0.4.

Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure in newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation: multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial

MARTANO, Claudio;FABRIS, Claudio;
2004-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of nasal continuous positive airways pressure (nCPAP) in the management of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants is not completely defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of prophylactic nCPAP in infants of 28-31 weeks gestation. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Seventeen Italian neonatal intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 230 newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation, not intubated in the delivery room and without major malformations, were randomly assigned to prophylactic or rescue nCPAP. INTERVENTIONS: Prophylactic nCPAP was started within 30 minutes of birth, irrespective of oxygen requirement and clinical status. Rescue nCPAP was started when Fio2 requirement was > 0.4, for more than 30 minutes, to maintain transcutaneous oxygen saturation between 93% and 96%. Exogenous surfactant was given when Fio2 requirement was > 0.4 in nCPAP in the presence of radiological signs of respiratory distress syndrome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point: need for exogenous surfactant. Secondary end points: need for mechanical ventilation and incidence of air leaks. RESULTS: Surfactant was needed by 22.6% in the prophylaxis group and 21.7% in the rescue group. Mechanical ventilation was required by 12.2% in both the prophylaxis and rescue group. The incidence of air leaks was 2.6% in both groups. More than 80% of both groups had received prenatal steroids. CONCLUSIONS: In newborns of 28-31 weeks gestation, there is no greater benefit in giving prophylactic nCPAP than in starting nCPAP when the oxygen requirement increases to a Fio2 > 0.4.
2004
89 (5)
F394
F398
SANDRI F; ANCORA G; LANZONI A; TAGLIABUE P; COLNAGHI M; VENTURA M. L; RINALDI M; MONDELLO I; GANCIA P; SALVIOLI G.P; ORZALESI M; MOSCA F; MARTANO C; FABRIS C; THE PNEUMOLOGY STUDY GROUP OF THE ITALIAN SOCIETY OF NEONATOLOGY
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/36742
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact