We compared the safety and efficacy of alternating deferoxamine and deferiprone with that of deferoxamine monotherapy. Sixty transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients regularly treated with deferoxamine were randomized to continue deferoxamine alone or to receive an alternating therapy for one year. Both arms resulted in equivalent decreases of serum ferritin and liver iron concentration. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with adverse events in the two therapy groups although the nature of the adverse events differed according to the chelation regimen.

A prospective randomized controlled trial on the safety and efficacy of alternating deferoxamine and deferiprone in the treatment of iron overload in patients with thalassemia

PIGA, Antonio Giulio;
2006-01-01

Abstract

We compared the safety and efficacy of alternating deferoxamine and deferiprone with that of deferoxamine monotherapy. Sixty transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients regularly treated with deferoxamine were randomized to continue deferoxamine alone or to receive an alternating therapy for one year. Both arms resulted in equivalent decreases of serum ferritin and liver iron concentration. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with adverse events in the two therapy groups although the nature of the adverse events differed according to the chelation regimen.
2006
91
1241
1243
GALANELLO R; KATTAMIS A; PIGA A; FISCHER R; LEONI G; LADIS V; VOI V; LUND U; TRICTA F
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Galanello-2006-RCT-deferiprone-alternating.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 85.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
85.33 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/38058
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 81
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact