OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether home treatment of elderly patients with acute uncomplicated first ischemic stroke is associated with different mortality rates and clinical outcomes from those of patients treated on a general medical ward (GMW). DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. SETTING: S. Giovanni Battista Hospital of Turin. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty elderly patients admitted to the emergency department of the hospital with first acute ischemic stroke were randomized to home treatment from a geriatric home hospitalization service (GHHS) or to GMW treatment. MEASUREMENT: Main outcome was cumulative survival at 6 months in the two groups. Residual functional impairment, neurological deficit, depression, morbidity, and admission to rehabilitation and long-term care facilities were considered as secondary outcomes in survivors. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients (mean age 82; 54 men and 66 women) were enrolled (60 in each study arm). The cumulative proportion of cases surviving at 6 months was 0.65 in the GHHS group and 0.60 in GMW group (log-rank test P=.53). Functional and neurological parameters were significantly improved in both GHHS and GMW patients, without significant differences between the two groups. Depression score was significantly better in home-treated patients (P<.001), who were more likely to remain at home at 6 months than hospital-treated patients and had a lower rate of select medical complications. CONCLUSION: Home-treated elderly patients with ischemic stroke have better depressive scores and lower rates of admission to nursing homes. These results should prompt further studies to evaluate home hospitalization for elderly stroke patients.

Home hospitalization service for acute uncomplicated first ischemic stroke in elderly patients: a randomized trial.

BO, Mario;MOLASCHI, Mario;
2004-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether home treatment of elderly patients with acute uncomplicated first ischemic stroke is associated with different mortality rates and clinical outcomes from those of patients treated on a general medical ward (GMW). DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. SETTING: S. Giovanni Battista Hospital of Turin. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty elderly patients admitted to the emergency department of the hospital with first acute ischemic stroke were randomized to home treatment from a geriatric home hospitalization service (GHHS) or to GMW treatment. MEASUREMENT: Main outcome was cumulative survival at 6 months in the two groups. Residual functional impairment, neurological deficit, depression, morbidity, and admission to rehabilitation and long-term care facilities were considered as secondary outcomes in survivors. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients (mean age 82; 54 men and 66 women) were enrolled (60 in each study arm). The cumulative proportion of cases surviving at 6 months was 0.65 in the GHHS group and 0.60 in GMW group (log-rank test P=.53). Functional and neurological parameters were significantly improved in both GHHS and GMW patients, without significant differences between the two groups. Depression score was significantly better in home-treated patients (P<.001), who were more likely to remain at home at 6 months than hospital-treated patients and had a lower rate of select medical complications. CONCLUSION: Home-treated elderly patients with ischemic stroke have better depressive scores and lower rates of admission to nursing homes. These results should prompt further studies to evaluate home hospitalization for elderly stroke patients.
2004
52
278
283
RICAUDA NA ;BO M ;MOLASCHI M ;MASSAIA M ;SALERNO D ;AMATI D ;TIBALDI V ;FABRIS F
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JAGS HHS stroke.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 84.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
84.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/39758
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 67
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 63
social impact