BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extracorporeal shock waves (ESWs) are used to good effect in the treatment of soft tissue injuries, but the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. We therefore determined the effects of ESWs on normal fibroblasts in vitro, in order to assess treatment-induced cell response. METHODS: A normal human fibroblast cell line (NHDF-12519) was treated with ESWs generated by a piezoelectric device (Piezoson 100; Richard Wolfe) using different protocols of impulses (300, 1,000, or 2,000 shots) and energy (0.11 or 0.22 mJ/mm(2)). Untreated controls and treated cells were cultivated for 12 days following a single shock-wave treatment. Viability, growth rate, and expression of mRNA for TGFbeta-1 and collagen types I and III were evaluated at days 3, 6, 9, and 12. RESULTS: 1 hour after shock-wave treatment, cell viability showed a decrease related mainly to impulse numbers applied. Fibroblasts treated with energy of 0.22 mJ/mm(2) subsequently showed an increase in proliferation from day 6 to day 9 that was higher than in untreated controls, without interference with the normal cell kinetic profile. mRNA expression was also higher in treated fibroblasts than in untreated controls for TGFbeta-1 on day 6 and day 9, for collagen type I on day 6, and for collagen type III on day 9. INTERPRETATION: These in vitro data confirm that the main factors involved in the repair process of connective tissues are activated by ESWs. The study gives the rationale for, and may provide schedules for, ESW treatment of tendonopathies.

Extracorporeal shock waves enhance normal fibroblast proliferation in vitro and activate mRNA expression for TGF-beta1 and for collagen types I and III.

BERTA, Laura Adelaide Angela;CATALANO, Maria Graziella;FRAIRIA, Roberto
2009-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Extracorporeal shock waves (ESWs) are used to good effect in the treatment of soft tissue injuries, but the underlying mechanisms are still unknown. We therefore determined the effects of ESWs on normal fibroblasts in vitro, in order to assess treatment-induced cell response. METHODS: A normal human fibroblast cell line (NHDF-12519) was treated with ESWs generated by a piezoelectric device (Piezoson 100; Richard Wolfe) using different protocols of impulses (300, 1,000, or 2,000 shots) and energy (0.11 or 0.22 mJ/mm(2)). Untreated controls and treated cells were cultivated for 12 days following a single shock-wave treatment. Viability, growth rate, and expression of mRNA for TGFbeta-1 and collagen types I and III were evaluated at days 3, 6, 9, and 12. RESULTS: 1 hour after shock-wave treatment, cell viability showed a decrease related mainly to impulse numbers applied. Fibroblasts treated with energy of 0.22 mJ/mm(2) subsequently showed an increase in proliferation from day 6 to day 9 that was higher than in untreated controls, without interference with the normal cell kinetic profile. mRNA expression was also higher in treated fibroblasts than in untreated controls for TGFbeta-1 on day 6 and day 9, for collagen type I on day 6, and for collagen type III on day 9. INTERPRETATION: These in vitro data confirm that the main factors involved in the repair process of connective tissues are activated by ESWs. The study gives the rationale for, and may provide schedules for, ESW treatment of tendonopathies.
2009
80(5)
612
617
Shock Waves; High energy shock waves (HESW); Fibroblasts
Berta L; Fazzari A; Ficco AM; Enrica PM; Catalano MG; Frairia R
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Acta Orthop 2009.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 271.63 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
271.63 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
442253_postprint.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 609.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
609.5 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/82366
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 47
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact