The objective of this paper is to show how ambiguity, and a decision maker (DM)'s response to it, can be modelled formally in the context of a general decision model. We introduce a relation derived from the DM's preferences, called "unambiguous preference'', and show that it can be represented by a set of probabilities. We provide such set with a simple differential characterization, and argue that it is a behavioral representation of the "ambiguity'' that the DM may perceive. Given such revealed ambiguity, we provide a representation of ambiguity attitudes. We also characterize axiomatically a special case of our decision model, the "alpha-maxmin'' expected utility model.

Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude

GHIRARDATO, Paolo;MARINACCI, Massimo
2004-01-01

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to show how ambiguity, and a decision maker (DM)'s response to it, can be modelled formally in the context of a general decision model. We introduce a relation derived from the DM's preferences, called "unambiguous preference'', and show that it can be represented by a set of probabilities. We provide such set with a simple differential characterization, and argue that it is a behavioral representation of the "ambiguity'' that the DM may perceive. Given such revealed ambiguity, we provide a representation of ambiguity attitudes. We also characterize axiomatically a special case of our decision model, the "alpha-maxmin'' expected utility model.
2004
118
133
173
P. GHIRARDATO; F. MACCHERONI; M. MARINACCI
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
diffpub.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 447.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
447.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/101341
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 512
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 476
social impact