The author analyses the four most recent Court of Justice’s judgements in matter of working time: on the one hand, with Union Syndacal Solidaires Isère and Accardo cases, the Court has limited even more the possibility of derogating from the rules on daily and weekly rest period; on the other, with the twin rulings Fuß I and Fuß II, it has further clarified the rule fixing the maximum weekly working hours, highlighting its fundamental importance. Once again, the Court of Justice –balancing the needs of employees with the flexibility requirements put forward by companies – proves to be increasingly mindful of the workers’ right to a regular alternation between working and rest periods.
Working time directive and its interpretation: another major piece in the European social rights puzzle
FENOGLIO, Anna
2011-01-01
Abstract
The author analyses the four most recent Court of Justice’s judgements in matter of working time: on the one hand, with Union Syndacal Solidaires Isère and Accardo cases, the Court has limited even more the possibility of derogating from the rules on daily and weekly rest period; on the other, with the twin rulings Fuß I and Fuß II, it has further clarified the rule fixing the maximum weekly working hours, highlighting its fundamental importance. Once again, the Court of Justice –balancing the needs of employees with the flexibility requirements put forward by companies – proves to be increasingly mindful of the workers’ right to a regular alternation between working and rest periods.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
per ASN copertina + estratto.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
197.55 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
197.55 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.