For any kind of social ontology, the first step coincides with the recognition of a sphere of social objects: money, works of art, marriage etc. To recognise these objects means including them in the ontological apparatus of reality, in the same way as trees, stones, mountains, etc. (raw facts). Both Searle (2005) and Ferraris (2009) start from a mere analysis of these objects, the differences between their philosophical approaches lie in the ‘givenness’ of these objects
“Documentality: an ethical upshot”
CAFFO, LEONARDO
2012-01-01
Abstract
For any kind of social ontology, the first step coincides with the recognition of a sphere of social objects: money, works of art, marriage etc. To recognise these objects means including them in the ontological apparatus of reality, in the same way as trees, stones, mountains, etc. (raw facts). Both Searle (2005) and Ferraris (2009) start from a mere analysis of these objects, the differences between their philosophical approaches lie in the ‘givenness’ of these objects
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
