Summary Background Vasomotor symptoms and bone loss are complications frequently induced by adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Tibolone prevents both side-eff ects, but its eff ect on cancer recurrence is unknown. The aim of this study was to show non-inferiority of tibolone to placebo regarding risk of recurrence in breast-cancer patients with climacteric complaints. Methods Between July 11, 2002, and Dec 20, 2004, women surgically treated for a histologically confi rmed breast cancer (T1–3N0–2M0) with vasomotor symptoms were randomly assigned to either tibolone 2·5 mg daily or placebo at 245 centres in 31 countries. Randomisation was done by use of a centralised interactive voice response system, stratified by centre, with a block size of four. The primary endpoint was breast-cancer recurrence, including contralateral breast cancer, and was analysed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol populations; the margin for non-inferiority was set as a hazard ratio of 1·278. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00408863. Findings Of the 3148 women randomised, 3098 were included in the ITT analysis (1556 in the tibolone group and 1542 in the placebo group). Mean age at randomisation was 52·7 years (SD 7·3) and mean time since surgery was 2·1 years (SD 1·3). 1792 of 3098 (58%) women were node positive and 2185 of 3098 (71%) were oestrogen-receptor positive. At study entry, 2068 of 3098 (67%) women used tamoxifen and 202 of 3098 (6·5%) women used aromatase inhibitors. The mean daily number of hot fl ushes was 6·4 (SD 5·1). After a median follow-up of 3·1 years (range 0·01–4·99), 237 of 1556 (15·2%) women on tibolone had a cancer recurrence, compared with 165 of 1542 (10·7%) on placebo (HR 1·40 [95% CI 1·14–1·70]; p=0·001). Results in the per-protocol population were similar (209 of 1254 [16·7%] women in the tibolone group had a recurrence vs 138 of 1213 [11·4%] women in the placebo group; HR 1·44 [95% CI 1·16–1·79]; p=0·0009). Tibolone was not diff erent from placebo with regard to other safety outcomes, such as mortality (72 patients vs 63 patients, respectively), cardiovascular events (14 vs 10, respectively), or gynaecological cancers (10 vs 10, respectively). Vasomotor symptoms and bone-mineral density improved signifi cantly with tibolone, compared with placebo. Interpretation Tibolone increases the risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients, while relieving vasomotor symptoms and preventing bone loss.

Safety and efficacy of tibolone in breast-cancer patients with vasomotor symptoms: a double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

SISMONDI, Piero;BIGLIA, Nicoletta;
2009-01-01

Abstract

Summary Background Vasomotor symptoms and bone loss are complications frequently induced by adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Tibolone prevents both side-eff ects, but its eff ect on cancer recurrence is unknown. The aim of this study was to show non-inferiority of tibolone to placebo regarding risk of recurrence in breast-cancer patients with climacteric complaints. Methods Between July 11, 2002, and Dec 20, 2004, women surgically treated for a histologically confi rmed breast cancer (T1–3N0–2M0) with vasomotor symptoms were randomly assigned to either tibolone 2·5 mg daily or placebo at 245 centres in 31 countries. Randomisation was done by use of a centralised interactive voice response system, stratified by centre, with a block size of four. The primary endpoint was breast-cancer recurrence, including contralateral breast cancer, and was analysed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol populations; the margin for non-inferiority was set as a hazard ratio of 1·278. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00408863. Findings Of the 3148 women randomised, 3098 were included in the ITT analysis (1556 in the tibolone group and 1542 in the placebo group). Mean age at randomisation was 52·7 years (SD 7·3) and mean time since surgery was 2·1 years (SD 1·3). 1792 of 3098 (58%) women were node positive and 2185 of 3098 (71%) were oestrogen-receptor positive. At study entry, 2068 of 3098 (67%) women used tamoxifen and 202 of 3098 (6·5%) women used aromatase inhibitors. The mean daily number of hot fl ushes was 6·4 (SD 5·1). After a median follow-up of 3·1 years (range 0·01–4·99), 237 of 1556 (15·2%) women on tibolone had a cancer recurrence, compared with 165 of 1542 (10·7%) on placebo (HR 1·40 [95% CI 1·14–1·70]; p=0·001). Results in the per-protocol population were similar (209 of 1254 [16·7%] women in the tibolone group had a recurrence vs 138 of 1213 [11·4%] women in the placebo group; HR 1·44 [95% CI 1·16–1·79]; p=0·0009). Tibolone was not diff erent from placebo with regard to other safety outcomes, such as mortality (72 patients vs 63 patients, respectively), cardiovascular events (14 vs 10, respectively), or gynaecological cancers (10 vs 10, respectively). Vasomotor symptoms and bone-mineral density improved signifi cantly with tibolone, compared with placebo. Interpretation Tibolone increases the risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients, while relieving vasomotor symptoms and preventing bone loss.
2009
2
135
146
Breast Cancer; menopause; hot flushes; treatment; recurrence
Kenemans P; Bundred NJ; Foidart JM; Kubista E; von Schoultz B; Sismondi P; Vassilopoulou-Sellin R; Yip CH; Egberts J; Mol-Arts M; Mulder R; van Os S; Beckmann MW; Kenemans P; Foidart JM; Bundred NJ; Kubista E; von Schoultz B; Sismondi P; Vassilopoulou-Sellin R; Beckmann M; Yip CH; Baum M; Gray R; Burger CW; van Diest PJ; Harbeck N; Senn HJ; Svane G; Prins MH; Davidson B; Peters R; Longo ML; Kappelle LJ; MacLennan AH; Baber R; Eden JA; Furnival C; Stuckey B; Farrell E; Kubista E; Singer CF; Marth C; Reitsamer R; Sevelda P; Salzer H; Thiel I; Winter R; Putyrski L; Beliakouski V; Gedrevich Z; Tjalma W; Desreux J; Dhont M; Depypere H; van den Broecke R; Foidart JM; L'Hermite M; Nolens JP; Rozenberg S; Simon P; Vergote I; Gaspard U; Janssens D; De Gezelle H; Merchiers E; Aldrighi JM; Badalotti M; Bagnoli VR; Fernandes CE; Ferriani R; Pinto Neto AM; Menke CH; Petti DA; Urbanetz A; Del Giglio A; Cunill E; Sepúlveda H; Soto L; Uribe A; Valdivia I; Baptista J; Loaciga K; Bendova M; Buchta K; Pecha V; Reslova T; Hlavackova O; Mikulik M; Kütner R; Padrik P; Puistola U; Ylikorkala O; Mäenpää-Liukko K; Brémond A; Faure C; Seffert P; Delozier T; Espie M; Dupaigne D; Hoffet M; Laffargue F; Tunon de Lara C; Largillier L; Namer M; Dognon L; Routiot T; This P; Touraine P; Kimmig R; Kümmel S; Beckmann MW; Weiss J; Engel U; Brucker C; de Waal JC; Mallmann P; Rühl I; Untch M; Neumann C; Kulp A; Krause-Bergmann B; Schmidt-Rhode P; Seifert-Klauss V; Wallwiener D; Nestle-Krämling C; Starfl inger F; Sohn C; Bastert G; Thomas A; Lichtenegger W; Höss C; Chatsiproios D; Jonat W; de Wilde R; Dewitz T; Kühn T; Kiesel L; Blümel B; Schindler C; Splitt G; Leitsmann H; Köhler U; Langanke D; Landthaler R; Hindenburg HJ; Schoenegg W; Conrad B; Ortmann O; Boér K; Boros J; Cseh J; Kövér E; Landherr L; Ruzsa A; Erfán J; Fábián F; Páli K; Sismondi P; Biglia N; Genazzani AR; Mariani R; Martoni A; Scambia G; Santoro A; Burlizzi S; Amunni G; Amadori D; Noh DY; Kim JG; Ahn SH; Kang BM; Noh WC; Kim MH; Lee MH; Lee JJ; Keire G; Baltina D; Yip CH; Nik Nasri N; Gomez P; Sivalingam; Muniandy S; Cardenas J; Mainero F; Uscanga S; Fuentes A; Lugo R; Heijmans H; The HS; Franke H; van Riel J; van der Vegt S; Boven E; Houben P; Kok A; van Weering H; van de Walle A; Burggraaff JM; Mulder R; Alcedo J; Kornafel J; Litwiniuk M; Karnicka H; Bablok L; Marianowski; Basta A; Jakimiuk A; Curescu S; Draganescu ME; Eniu AE; Zbranca E; Peltecu G; Ancar V; Smetnik V; Kullikov EP; Petrossian A; Stekolschikova O; Popov A; Zoziouk N; Krikunova LI; Semiglazov V; Konstantinova M; Bezhenar VF; Diatchouk A; Manikhas G; Korytova LY; Vinogradov V; Sokurenko V; Baranov AN; Arkhipovsky VL; Bogatova IK; Akhmadulina LI; Kuts TN; Susloparova SA; Mitashok I; Kanzalie AL; Bryuzgin VV; Malygin EN; Sergeev IE; Pasman NM; Akishina ZV; Tuev AV; Kopp M; Soloviev VI; Evtushenko ID; Ershov GV; Devyatchenko NF; Potapov YN; Cheporov SV; Ogurtsov AV; Chrustalev ON; Lazareva DG; Bryukhina E; Matrosova M; Yu SL; Wong PC; Masak L; Sadovsky O; Petrovicova Z; Suska P; De Pablo JL; García E; Iglesias J; Mattsson L; Granberg G; Berglund L; Friberg B; Chen ST; Chow SN; Lee JN; Wang KL; Limpaphayom KK; Boonjong S; Jirapinyo M; Sakondhavat C; Taechakraichana N; Techatraisak K; Wilawan K; Tatarchuk T; Dudar L; Koshukova G; Gyryachyy V; Hotko YS; Kostynskyy Y; Paramonov V; Pertseva T; Shparyk Y; Tarasova O; Kosey N; Solskiy Y; Smolanka I; Kvashenko V; Grishyna O; Dzyak G; Bundred NJ; Drew JP; Mansel R; Williamson J; Kingsland CR; Vishwanath L; Bliss R; Crawford D; Winters Z; Browell D; Paterson M; Ind T; Rostom A; Pitkin J.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/120246
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 40
  • Scopus 266
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 209
social impact