We aimed to assess cross-cultural validity of the reporting of respiratory symptoms in the European Community Respiratory Health Study (ECRHS). A random sample of subjects from the general population (aged 20–44 yr), from 35 centers in 15 countries, answered a questionnaire and underwent allergy tests and airway challenge with methacholine. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 60% (n 5 16,635). Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify how symptoms were grouped (i.e., to specify factor structure), using data from the United Kingdom. Subsequently, a confirmatory factor analysis of the prespecified structure for the United Kingdom was assessed for each country in consecutive nested models, increasing at each step the number of parameters forced to be equal to the United Kingdom, and assessing the goodness of fit. Variables were clustered in the same four groups (factors) in all countries. The four factors, mutually adjusted, were associated with either bronchial responsiveness, atopy, or smoking, which provides coherence for the separation of the four factors. In the confirmatory factor analysis, when the load of each of the symptoms in the corresponding factor was prespecified, all countries except Spain showed an adequate fit; in Spain there were differences in answers concerning asthma treatment. We conclude that the ECRHS multilingual translated respiratory symptoms questionnaire shows high internal consistency, suggesting that international comparisons are not affected by errors due to cross-cultural variations in the reporting of symptoms.

International Assessment of the Internal Consistencyof Respiratory Symptoms

BUCCA, Caterina;ROMANO, Canzio;
2000-01-01

Abstract

We aimed to assess cross-cultural validity of the reporting of respiratory symptoms in the European Community Respiratory Health Study (ECRHS). A random sample of subjects from the general population (aged 20–44 yr), from 35 centers in 15 countries, answered a questionnaire and underwent allergy tests and airway challenge with methacholine. The overall response rate to the questionnaire was 60% (n 5 16,635). Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify how symptoms were grouped (i.e., to specify factor structure), using data from the United Kingdom. Subsequently, a confirmatory factor analysis of the prespecified structure for the United Kingdom was assessed for each country in consecutive nested models, increasing at each step the number of parameters forced to be equal to the United Kingdom, and assessing the goodness of fit. Variables were clustered in the same four groups (factors) in all countries. The four factors, mutually adjusted, were associated with either bronchial responsiveness, atopy, or smoking, which provides coherence for the separation of the four factors. In the confirmatory factor analysis, when the load of each of the symptoms in the corresponding factor was prespecified, all countries except Spain showed an adequate fit; in Spain there were differences in answers concerning asthma treatment. We conclude that the ECRHS multilingual translated respiratory symptoms questionnaire shows high internal consistency, suggesting that international comparisons are not affected by errors due to cross-cultural variations in the reporting of symptoms.
2000
162
930
935
Respiratory Symptoms
J. Sunyer; X. Basagana; P. Burney; JM. Antò; and Principal participants in the ECRHS study: Australia : M. Abramson; J. Kutin (Melbourne). Belgium : P. Vermeire; F. van Bastelaer (Antwerp South; Antwerp Central). France : J. Bousquet (Montpellier); F. Neukirch; R. Liard (Paris); I. Pin; C. Pison (Grenoble); A. Taytard (Bordeaux). Germany : H. Magnussen; D. Nowak (Hamburg); H. E. Wichmann; J. Heinrich (Erfurt). Iceland: T. Gislason; D. Gislason (Reykjavik). Ireland: J. Prichard; S. Allwright; D. MacLeod (Dublin). Italy: M. Bugiani; C. Bucca; C. Romano (Turin); R. de Marco; V. Lo Cascio; C. Campello (Verona); A. Marinoni; I. Cerveri; L. Casali (Pavia). The Netherlands: B. Rijcken; A. Kremer (Groningen; Bergen op Zoom; Geleen). New Zealand: J. Crane; S. Lewis (Wellington; Christchurch; Hawkes Bay).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/121503
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 53
social impact