We compared the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy and endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (stage I/II) who underwent R0 resection were included in an Italian multiinstitutional surgical survey. They were divided into 2 groups based on the operative approach (either conventional or endoscopic). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients underwent open adrenalectomy and 30 patients underwent endoscopic adrenalectomy. The 2 groups were well matched for age, sex, lesion size, and stage (P = NS). The mean follow-up time was similar for the 2 groups (P = NS). The local recurrence rate was 19% for open adrenalectomy and 21% for endoscopic adrenalectomy, whereas distant metastases were recorded in 31% of patients in the conventional adrenalectomy group and 17% in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). The mean time to recurrence was 27 ± 27 months in the conventional open adrenalectomy group and 29 ± 33 months in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (38.3% vs 58.2%) and 5-year overall survival rates (48% vs 67%; P = NS). CONCLUSION: The operative approach does not affect the oncologic outcome of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma, if the principles of surgical oncology are respected.

Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of localized (stage I/II) adrenocortical carcinoma: results of a multiinstitutional Italian survey

MORINO, Mario;
2012-01-01

Abstract

We compared the oncologic effectiveness of open adrenalectomy and endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma (stage I/II) who underwent R0 resection were included in an Italian multiinstitutional surgical survey. They were divided into 2 groups based on the operative approach (either conventional or endoscopic). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-six patients underwent open adrenalectomy and 30 patients underwent endoscopic adrenalectomy. The 2 groups were well matched for age, sex, lesion size, and stage (P = NS). The mean follow-up time was similar for the 2 groups (P = NS). The local recurrence rate was 19% for open adrenalectomy and 21% for endoscopic adrenalectomy, whereas distant metastases were recorded in 31% of patients in the conventional adrenalectomy group and 17% in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). The mean time to recurrence was 27 ± 27 months in the conventional open adrenalectomy group and 29 ± 33 months in the endoscopic adrenalectomy group (P = NS). No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of 5-year disease-free survival (38.3% vs 58.2%) and 5-year overall survival rates (48% vs 67%; P = NS). CONCLUSION: The operative approach does not affect the oncologic outcome of patients with localized adrenocortical carcinoma, if the principles of surgical oncology are respected.
2012
152
6
1158
1164
Lombardi CP; Raffaelli M.; De Crea C.; Boniardi M.; De Toma G.; Marzano LA; Miccoli P.; Minni F.; Morino M.; Pelizzo MR; Pietrabissa A.; Renda A.; Valeri A.; Bellantone R.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Open versus endoscopic adrenalectomy in the treatment of l….pdf

Open Access dal 01/08/2013

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 425.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
425.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1-s2.0-S003960601200459X-main.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 176.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
176.13 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/122001
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 31
  • Scopus 111
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 97
social impact