Background and purpose: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of pain in an epidemiological series of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared to population-based controls. Methods: Of the 183 patients with ALS resident in the province of Torino, Italy, 160 accepted to be interviewed. Controls were randomly selected from the lists of general practitioners. Pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Results: Patients with ALS reported pain more frequently than controls [91 (56.9%) vs. 53 (33.1%); P=0.001]. Pain frequency and intensity were correlated with a worse functional score and a longer disease duration. In patients with ALS, pain was more frequently located at the extremities (P=0.006). Pain interfered with all areas of daily function, but patients reported a greater interference than controls in the domains of enjoyment of life and relation with other people. Sixty-four patients (70.3% of those with pain) and 24 controls (45.3% of those with pain) (P=0.003) were treated for pain, most frequently with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. ALS cases were also more frequently prescribed non-opioid analgesics and opioids than controls. Conclusions: Our study indicates that pain is frequent in all stages of ALS, but that it often goes underrecognized and undertreated. It is significantly more frequent in patients with ALS than in population-based controls. Future studies need to clarify the mechanisms of pain in ALS and determine the most effective treatment strategy. © 2011 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology © 2011 EFNS.

Pain in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based controlled study

CHIO', Adriano;Canosa A;MOGLIA, CRISTINA;ILARDI, ANTONIO;CAMMAROSANO, Stefania;CALVO, Andrea
2012

Abstract

Background and purpose: To assess the prevalence and characteristics of pain in an epidemiological series of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared to population-based controls. Methods: Of the 183 patients with ALS resident in the province of Torino, Italy, 160 accepted to be interviewed. Controls were randomly selected from the lists of general practitioners. Pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory. Results: Patients with ALS reported pain more frequently than controls [91 (56.9%) vs. 53 (33.1%); P=0.001]. Pain frequency and intensity were correlated with a worse functional score and a longer disease duration. In patients with ALS, pain was more frequently located at the extremities (P=0.006). Pain interfered with all areas of daily function, but patients reported a greater interference than controls in the domains of enjoyment of life and relation with other people. Sixty-four patients (70.3% of those with pain) and 24 controls (45.3% of those with pain) (P=0.003) were treated for pain, most frequently with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. ALS cases were also more frequently prescribed non-opioid analgesics and opioids than controls. Conclusions: Our study indicates that pain is frequent in all stages of ALS, but that it often goes underrecognized and undertreated. It is significantly more frequent in patients with ALS than in population-based controls. Future studies need to clarify the mechanisms of pain in ALS and determine the most effective treatment strategy. © 2011 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology © 2011 EFNS.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
19
4
551
555
Chiò A; Canosa A; Gallo S; Moglia C; Ilardi A; Cammarosano S; Papurello D; Calvo A
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EJN 2012 - Chio - Pain in ALS.pdf

non disponibili

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 455.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
455.57 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
EJN 2012 - editorial on Chio pain in ALS.pdf

non disponibili

Tipo di file: MATERIALE NON BIBLIOGRAFICO
Dimensione 430.18 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
430.18 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/2318/126221
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 22
  • Scopus 68
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 58
social impact