Modern Law frames citizenship mainly in terms of nationality, allegedly the expression of the identity of the national community. Here I suggest a criticism of this basic conception of belonging: First, because of reasons dependants on the ambiguity of the very idea of nations; Second, because of the artificial character of the models of nationality prevailingly elaborated by legal science; Third, because the model of nationality does less than bargained for. It basically creates more problems than it is said to resolve. In particular, I focus on statelessness and the debate on citizenship as “the right to have rights” and explain why this idea is fundamentally flawed.
Cittadinanza, identità e il sovrano potere di escludere
MINDUS, Patricia Maria
2012-01-01
Abstract
Modern Law frames citizenship mainly in terms of nationality, allegedly the expression of the identity of the national community. Here I suggest a criticism of this basic conception of belonging: First, because of reasons dependants on the ambiguity of the very idea of nations; Second, because of the artificial character of the models of nationality prevailingly elaborated by legal science; Third, because the model of nationality does less than bargained for. It basically creates more problems than it is said to resolve. In particular, I focus on statelessness and the debate on citizenship as “the right to have rights” and explain why this idea is fundamentally flawed.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
bozze RP.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione
11.23 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
11.23 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.