Background: Italian legislation establishes the obligation for the employer to assess any risks to the safety and health of workers, including those relating to work-related stress (WRS). Several studies have proved the existence of a link between WRS and both individual diseases and organizational results. Objective: The research aimed at detecting WRS risk factors in a hospital consisting of 53 departments employing 2334 workers.Methods: A qualitative and quantitative approach was adopted divided into six steps: 1) analysis of the hospital indicators; 2) semistructured interviews of the 53 department heads; 3) preparation of a checklist including 42 WRS risk indicators; 4) observation by shadowing of the 53 departments; 5) setting up of 53 focus groups with staff from each department; 6) distribution of the check-list to a representative sample of 747 employees. Results: Data analysis showed a “low” level of WRS risk regarding the hospital as a whole, a “medium” level regarding six transversal indicators and eight departments. Three indicators considered particularly significant were examined in detail: “workplace and ergonomic conditions”, “shift work”, “interruptions in work flow”. Conclusions: The results helped to identify a series of best practices aimed at reducing WRS risk that are applicable to other health care settings. The qualitative and quantitative approach produced a keen involvement of the employees of the hospital which will positively encourage the real efficacy of the measures taken.
L’identificazione dei fattori di rischio stress lavoro-correlato in un’Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera: un approccio quali-quantitativo - Identification of risk factors for work-related stress in a hospital: a qualitative and quantitative approach
CORTESE, Claudio Giovanni;
2013-01-01
Abstract
Background: Italian legislation establishes the obligation for the employer to assess any risks to the safety and health of workers, including those relating to work-related stress (WRS). Several studies have proved the existence of a link between WRS and both individual diseases and organizational results. Objective: The research aimed at detecting WRS risk factors in a hospital consisting of 53 departments employing 2334 workers.Methods: A qualitative and quantitative approach was adopted divided into six steps: 1) analysis of the hospital indicators; 2) semistructured interviews of the 53 department heads; 3) preparation of a checklist including 42 WRS risk indicators; 4) observation by shadowing of the 53 departments; 5) setting up of 53 focus groups with staff from each department; 6) distribution of the check-list to a representative sample of 747 employees. Results: Data analysis showed a “low” level of WRS risk regarding the hospital as a whole, a “medium” level regarding six transversal indicators and eight departments. Three indicators considered particularly significant were examined in detail: “workplace and ergonomic conditions”, “shift work”, “interruptions in work flow”. Conclusions: The results helped to identify a series of best practices aimed at reducing WRS risk that are applicable to other health care settings. The qualitative and quantitative approach produced a keen involvement of the employees of the hospital which will positively encourage the real efficacy of the measures taken.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
