OBJECTIVEdWe investigated the perceptions of diabetes care and diabetes in patients followed long-term by group or usual care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSD Three open questions were administered to 120 patients (43 with T1DM and 77 with T2DM) who had been randomized at least 2 years before to be followed by group care and 121 (41 T1DM and 80 T2DM) who had always been on usual care. The responses were analyzed by propositional analysis, by identifying the focal nuclei, i.e., the terms around which all sentences are organized, and then other predicates, according to their hierarchical relationship to the nuclear proposition. Specific communicative units were arbitrarily classified into three categories: attitudes, empowerment, and locus of control. RESULTS Patients on group care showed more positive attitudes, higher sense of empowerment, and more internal locus of control than those on usual care. In addition, they expressed a wider and more articulated range of concepts associated with the care received and made less use ofmedical terminology (P,0.001, all).Higher HbA1c was associated with negative attitudes (P = 0.025) and negative empowerment (P = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS Group treatment reinforces communication and peer identification and may achieve its clinical results by promoting awareness, self-efficacy, positive attitudes toward diabetes and the setting of care, an internal locus of control, and, ultimately, empowerment in the patients.

A study of patients’ perceptions of diabetes care delivery and diabetes. Propositional analysis in people with type 1 and 2 diabetes managed by group or usual care

CHARRIER, Lorena;CAVALLO, Franco;PORTA, Massimo;TRENTO, Marina
2012-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVEdWe investigated the perceptions of diabetes care and diabetes in patients followed long-term by group or usual care. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSD Three open questions were administered to 120 patients (43 with T1DM and 77 with T2DM) who had been randomized at least 2 years before to be followed by group care and 121 (41 T1DM and 80 T2DM) who had always been on usual care. The responses were analyzed by propositional analysis, by identifying the focal nuclei, i.e., the terms around which all sentences are organized, and then other predicates, according to their hierarchical relationship to the nuclear proposition. Specific communicative units were arbitrarily classified into three categories: attitudes, empowerment, and locus of control. RESULTS Patients on group care showed more positive attitudes, higher sense of empowerment, and more internal locus of control than those on usual care. In addition, they expressed a wider and more articulated range of concepts associated with the care received and made less use ofmedical terminology (P,0.001, all).Higher HbA1c was associated with negative attitudes (P = 0.025) and negative empowerment (P = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS Group treatment reinforces communication and peer identification and may achieve its clinical results by promoting awareness, self-efficacy, positive attitudes toward diabetes and the setting of care, an internal locus of control, and, ultimately, empowerment in the patients.
2012
35
2
242
247
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3263876/
Patient education, Group Care, Type 2 and Type 1 diabetes.
Raballo M; Trevisan M; Trinetta A; Charrier L; Cavallo F; Porta M; Trento M
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Trento M, Diabetes Care. Analisi proposizionale, 2012.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: PDF Editoriale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 187.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
187.29 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/130320
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact