The making of the European polity over the centuries has produced a stock of key ideas that today are shared across the European space. The notion that citizens have rights protected through adjudication is one of such key ideas. The European construction launched in 1957 by the six original Member States of the European Economic Community depends upon it to the extent that the working of community law today cannot be explained without it. The European Convention on Human Rights signed in 1950 works on the basis of the same premise, insofar that text allows individual complaints for the violation of human rights. Upon closer examination, however, the rich common heritage backing these foundational texts shows that the central notion of a right - deployed in countless instances by lawyers and lay people alike - remains controversial. The role that such notion should play in the legal system is controversial too. As a matter of fact, the variety of points of view emerging across Europe on these issues is such that to go beyond these generalities is to begin navigation in troubled waters. This essay aims to clarify the origins of the present difficulties evoked above.

Rights in the European Landscape. A Historical and Comparative Profile

GRAZIADEI, Michele
2008-01-01

Abstract

The making of the European polity over the centuries has produced a stock of key ideas that today are shared across the European space. The notion that citizens have rights protected through adjudication is one of such key ideas. The European construction launched in 1957 by the six original Member States of the European Economic Community depends upon it to the extent that the working of community law today cannot be explained without it. The European Convention on Human Rights signed in 1950 works on the basis of the same premise, insofar that text allows individual complaints for the violation of human rights. Upon closer examination, however, the rich common heritage backing these foundational texts shows that the central notion of a right - deployed in countless instances by lawyers and lay people alike - remains controversial. The role that such notion should play in the legal system is controversial too. As a matter of fact, the variety of points of view emerging across Europe on these issues is such that to go beyond these generalities is to begin navigation in troubled waters. This essay aims to clarify the origins of the present difficulties evoked above.
2008
The Coherence of EU Law: the Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts
Oxford University Press
Oxford Studies in European Law
63
90
9780199232468
diritto soggettivo; diritto comparato; diritto europeo
M. GRAZIADEI
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
rights.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 2.52 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.52 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/133793
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact