Kilwardby's Commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics evinces a desire to synthetize Aristotelian natural philosophy with traditional Augustinian material. Such a synthesis had already been a goal of Robert Grosseteste's commentary on the same text; for instance, we find Kilwardby accommodating two senses of the term "universal": in one sense it refers to something in the divine intellect, and in another it means a form that is immanent in things and determines their character; the former notion springs from Neoplatonic origins, via Augustine. Besides that, Kilwardby's commentary, in turn, was used by Albert the Great and in this way transmitted to Thomas Aquinas.
Robert Kilwardby and the Aristotelian Theory of Science
CORBINI, Amos
2012-01-01
Abstract
Kilwardby's Commentary on Aristotle's Posterior Analytics evinces a desire to synthetize Aristotelian natural philosophy with traditional Augustinian material. Such a synthesis had already been a goal of Robert Grosseteste's commentary on the same text; for instance, we find Kilwardby accommodating two senses of the term "universal": in one sense it refers to something in the divine intellect, and in another it means a form that is immanent in things and determines their character; the former notion springs from Neoplatonic origins, via Augustine. Besides that, Kilwardby's commentary, in turn, was used by Albert the Great and in this way transmitted to Thomas Aquinas.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Corbini_kilwardby_English.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione
540.88 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
540.88 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.