We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxycodone/acetaminophen (O/A) and codeine/acetaminophen (C/A) vs. conventional therapy (CT) without opioids in older women suffering from osteoarthritis (OA)-related pain, sub-optimally responsive to prior conventional treatments. We performed a 6 week, randomized, single blind, controlled study in three nursing homes. We enrolled 154 women with painful OA. They were assigned to treatment with O/A (n=52) and C/A (n=52) vs. CT (n=50). We evaluated at baseline and at week 6: average pain in the last week (mean pain, MeP), pain at rest (RP), pain in movement (MP) (numeric rating scale, NRS); depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II, BDI-II); functional status (activities of daily living, ADL) and cognitive status (mini mental state evaluation, MMSE). We considered the adverse events (AEs) in the study period. At week 6, MeP, RP and MP were significantly reduced in all three groups (p<0.001); compared to CT, O/A and C/A were associated with greater reductions in MeP (p<0.001 and p=0.004, respectively), in RP (p=0.028 and p=0.032, respectively) in MP (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively) and with significant improvement in BDI-II score (p=0.05 and p=0.04, respectively) and ADL value (p=0.04 and p=0.05, respectively). AE rates did not differ between groups

Efficacy of oxycodone/acetaminophen and codeine/acetaminphen vs conventional therapy in ederly women with persistent moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain

BO, Mario;ISAIA, Gianluca;
2009-01-01

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oxycodone/acetaminophen (O/A) and codeine/acetaminophen (C/A) vs. conventional therapy (CT) without opioids in older women suffering from osteoarthritis (OA)-related pain, sub-optimally responsive to prior conventional treatments. We performed a 6 week, randomized, single blind, controlled study in three nursing homes. We enrolled 154 women with painful OA. They were assigned to treatment with O/A (n=52) and C/A (n=52) vs. CT (n=50). We evaluated at baseline and at week 6: average pain in the last week (mean pain, MeP), pain at rest (RP), pain in movement (MP) (numeric rating scale, NRS); depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II, BDI-II); functional status (activities of daily living, ADL) and cognitive status (mini mental state evaluation, MMSE). We considered the adverse events (AEs) in the study period. At week 6, MeP, RP and MP were significantly reduced in all three groups (p<0.001); compared to CT, O/A and C/A were associated with greater reductions in MeP (p<0.001 and p=0.004, respectively), in RP (p=0.028 and p=0.032, respectively) in MP (p<0.001 and p=0.002, respectively) and with significant improvement in BDI-II score (p=0.05 and p=0.04, respectively) and ADL value (p=0.04 and p=0.05, respectively). AE rates did not differ between groups
2009
49
378
382
Laura Corsinovi; Elisa Martinelli; Gianfranco Fonte; Marco Astengo; Alessandro Sona; Antonia Gatti; Massimiliano Massaia; Mario Bo; Mauro Zanocchi; Giuliana Michelis; Gianluca Isaia; Mario Molaschi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
439696_postprint.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 314.05 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
314.05 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/135313
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact