Evergreen azaleas (Rhododendron subg. Tsutsusi) are ornamental plants which usually grow in acidic soils. They perform best when the pH ranges between 4.5 and 6.0. On calcareous soils, they often show strong iron-deficiency chlorosis symptoms and their growth is inhibited. Therefore their cultivation area is limited. However, wild azaleas were seen to show different adaptability to soil pH, according to species and habitat environment. With a long-term goal of selecting commercial genotypes tolerant to pH higher than optimum, we collected plant materials in the wild and in historical gardens and we performed specific crosses. To evaluate their neutral-basic pH tolerance, seeds were placed to germinate at nine different pH regimes ranging from 2 to 8.5. Ultra acid pH inhibited seed germination especially in R. macrosepalum, R. ripense and R. japonicum. However a clear correlation between germination capacity and pH was not observed. Genotype dependent differences were better observed by a screening, in which rooted cuttings were grown in nutritive solutions at three pH regimes (6.0, 7.5, and 9.0). R. indicum showed serious chlorosis symptoms in all conditions. By contrast, R. macrosepalum var. hanaguruma and R. scabrum were tolerant to neutral-basic pH, showing very limited leaf damage. As confirmed by molecular analyses, these two latter species belong to the subsection Macrosepala and are close related to R. ripense, whose elevated pH tolerance was already known. These wild genetic resources appear promising for pH tolerance breeding efforts.

Evergreen azaleas tolerant to neutral and basic soils: breeding potential of wild genetic resources.

SCARIOT, VALENTINA;CASER, Matteo;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Evergreen azaleas (Rhododendron subg. Tsutsusi) are ornamental plants which usually grow in acidic soils. They perform best when the pH ranges between 4.5 and 6.0. On calcareous soils, they often show strong iron-deficiency chlorosis symptoms and their growth is inhibited. Therefore their cultivation area is limited. However, wild azaleas were seen to show different adaptability to soil pH, according to species and habitat environment. With a long-term goal of selecting commercial genotypes tolerant to pH higher than optimum, we collected plant materials in the wild and in historical gardens and we performed specific crosses. To evaluate their neutral-basic pH tolerance, seeds were placed to germinate at nine different pH regimes ranging from 2 to 8.5. Ultra acid pH inhibited seed germination especially in R. macrosepalum, R. ripense and R. japonicum. However a clear correlation between germination capacity and pH was not observed. Genotype dependent differences were better observed by a screening, in which rooted cuttings were grown in nutritive solutions at three pH regimes (6.0, 7.5, and 9.0). R. indicum showed serious chlorosis symptoms in all conditions. By contrast, R. macrosepalum var. hanaguruma and R. scabrum were tolerant to neutral-basic pH, showing very limited leaf damage. As confirmed by molecular analyses, these two latter species belong to the subsection Macrosepala and are close related to R. ripense, whose elevated pH tolerance was already known. These wild genetic resources appear promising for pH tolerance breeding efforts.
2013
990
287
291
abiotic stress; alkalinization; calcium carbonate; Rhododendron; pH
Scariot V; Caser M; Kobayashi N
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Scariot et al_ACTAHORT_2013 EDITOR.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 135.19 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
135.19 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Scariot et al_ACTAHORT_2013 POSTPRINT.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 418.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
418.93 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/140619
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact