When a State is in immediate danger of defaulting on its sovereign bond payments, restructuring is often the only solution. Currently, however, there is no single forum to address issues related to debt restructuring. In 2003, the proposal to create a sovereign debt restructuring mechanism (SDRM) was rejected by IMF members. Besides, collective action clauses have become a common feature of newly issued bonds: they restrict the ability of individual bondholders to initiate disruptive litigation and are designed to streamline the restructuring process. In this scenario, investment rules can in some cases complicate countries' efforts to effectively implement a debt restructuring. The paper focuses on bondholders' recourse to investor-State dispute settlement (see Abaclat et al. v. Argentina, ICSID Case n. ARB/07/5 ). We contend that if investment arbitration might prove effective in protecting the financial interests of individual bondholders, it could also threaten the debt restructuring process. As the financial crisis is harshly demonstrating, the establishment of an orderly debt restructuring mechanism is one of the greatest common concerns of the international community.

Sovereign Debt Restructuring and Investment Protection

VITERBO, Annamaria
2014-01-01

Abstract

When a State is in immediate danger of defaulting on its sovereign bond payments, restructuring is often the only solution. Currently, however, there is no single forum to address issues related to debt restructuring. In 2003, the proposal to create a sovereign debt restructuring mechanism (SDRM) was rejected by IMF members. Besides, collective action clauses have become a common feature of newly issued bonds: they restrict the ability of individual bondholders to initiate disruptive litigation and are designed to streamline the restructuring process. In this scenario, investment rules can in some cases complicate countries' efforts to effectively implement a debt restructuring. The paper focuses on bondholders' recourse to investor-State dispute settlement (see Abaclat et al. v. Argentina, ICSID Case n. ARB/07/5 ). We contend that if investment arbitration might prove effective in protecting the financial interests of individual bondholders, it could also threaten the debt restructuring process. As the financial crisis is harshly demonstrating, the establishment of an orderly debt restructuring mechanism is one of the greatest common concerns of the international community.
2014
Foreign Investments, International Law and Common Concerns
Routledge
336
348
9780415816052
http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415816052/
sovereign debt restructuring; International investment law
Annamaria Viterbo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Foreign investment.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: scanner
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 9.42 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.42 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/142289
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact