Neurocognitive function, neurological symptoms, functional independence, and health-related quality of life are major concerns for patients with brain metastases. The inclusion of these endpoints in trials of brain metastases and the methods by which these measures are assessed vary substantially. If functional independence or health-related quality of life are planned as key study outcomes, then the reliability and validity of these endpoints can be crucial because methodological issues might affect the interpretation and acceptance of findings. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group is an independent, international, and collaborative effort to improve the design of clinical trials in patients with brain tumours. In this report, the second in a two-part series, we review clinical trials of brain metastases in relation to measures of clinical benefit and provide a framework for the design and conduct of future trials.

Challenges relating to solid tumour brain metastases in clinical trials, part 2: neurocognitive, neurological, and quality-of-life outcomes. A report from the RANO group.

SOFFIETTI, Riccardo;
2013-01-01

Abstract

Neurocognitive function, neurological symptoms, functional independence, and health-related quality of life are major concerns for patients with brain metastases. The inclusion of these endpoints in trials of brain metastases and the methods by which these measures are assessed vary substantially. If functional independence or health-related quality of life are planned as key study outcomes, then the reliability and validity of these endpoints can be crucial because methodological issues might affect the interpretation and acceptance of findings. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group is an independent, international, and collaborative effort to improve the design of clinical trials in patients with brain tumours. In this report, the second in a two-part series, we review clinical trials of brain metastases in relation to measures of clinical benefit and provide a framework for the design and conduct of future trials.
2013
14
10E
407
416
CELL LUNG-CANCER, PROPHYLACTIC CRANIAL IRRADIATION, PHASE-III TRIAL, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL, RADIATION-THERAPY, BREAST-CANCER, STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY, MOTEXAFIN GADOLINIUM, END-POINTS, SURGICAL RESECTION
N. U. Lin;J. S. Wefel;E. Q. Lee;D. Schiff;M. J. van;R. Soffietti;J. H. Suh;M. A. Vogelbaum;M. P. Mehta;J. Dancey;M. E. Linskey;D. R. Camidge;H. Aoyama;P. D. Brown;S. M. Chang;S. N. Kalkanis;I. J. Barani;B. G. Baumert;L. E. Gaspar;F. S. Hodi;D. R. Macdonald;P. Y. Wen;R. A. in
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Lancet Oncol 2013 - Challenges 2.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 476.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
476.35 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/145996
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 44
  • Scopus 112
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 96
social impact