ABSTRACT. This work presents a comprehensive picture of As adsorption on a range of soil colloidal particles in comparable conditions of pH and ionic strength to allow a direct comparison of the surface interactions, including surface charging phenomena. The highest adsorption capacity for arsenite [As(III)] was shown by the iron minerals, with a clear shift in the surface charge. Pure ferrihydrite could retain over 5.3 µmol m-2 of As(III); the adsorption density was reduced to 3.36 µmol m-2 when ferrihydrite was a covering film on kaolinite surfaces. Goethite adsorbed up to 2.3 µmol m-2 but this amount was nearly halved on Al-substituted goethite and was much lower for hematite. Arsenite adsorption on a poorly ordered Al hydroxide was lower than on poorly ordered and crystalline Fe (hydr)oxides and its adsorption on gibbsite, kaolinite and calcite was almost negligible. When arsenate [As(V)] was added, a similar adsorption capacity for surface unit was shown by both Fe and Al minerals and, differently from As(III), As(V) was adsorbed also on kaolinite and calcite. The adsorption of arsenate on all adsorbents and of arsenite on Fe minerals were observed to be exothermic reaction. The differences in the affinity for As(III) and As(V) adsorption shown by the different soil components were explained in terms of differences in Lewis hardness/softness of adsorbate and adsorbents. These results provide a comparison between possible adsorbents to be used for remediation, and also to assess the As adsorption capacity of soils from their composition.

Surface Interactions of Arsenite and Arsenate on Soil Colloids

MARTIN, Maria;AJMONE MARSAN, Franco;BARBERIS, Elisabetta
2014-01-01

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This work presents a comprehensive picture of As adsorption on a range of soil colloidal particles in comparable conditions of pH and ionic strength to allow a direct comparison of the surface interactions, including surface charging phenomena. The highest adsorption capacity for arsenite [As(III)] was shown by the iron minerals, with a clear shift in the surface charge. Pure ferrihydrite could retain over 5.3 µmol m-2 of As(III); the adsorption density was reduced to 3.36 µmol m-2 when ferrihydrite was a covering film on kaolinite surfaces. Goethite adsorbed up to 2.3 µmol m-2 but this amount was nearly halved on Al-substituted goethite and was much lower for hematite. Arsenite adsorption on a poorly ordered Al hydroxide was lower than on poorly ordered and crystalline Fe (hydr)oxides and its adsorption on gibbsite, kaolinite and calcite was almost negligible. When arsenate [As(V)] was added, a similar adsorption capacity for surface unit was shown by both Fe and Al minerals and, differently from As(III), As(V) was adsorbed also on kaolinite and calcite. The adsorption of arsenate on all adsorbents and of arsenite on Fe minerals were observed to be exothermic reaction. The differences in the affinity for As(III) and As(V) adsorption shown by the different soil components were explained in terms of differences in Lewis hardness/softness of adsorbate and adsorbents. These results provide a comparison between possible adsorbents to be used for remediation, and also to assess the As adsorption capacity of soils from their composition.
2014
78
157
170
arsenic; Soil colloids; adsorption; aluminum oxides; iron oxides
M. Martin; A. Violante; F. Ajmone-Marsan; E. Barberis
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Surface interaction As oxides_published.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.24 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
AperTO_Martin_Arsenite_Arsenate Soil Colloids.pdf

Open Access dal 01/01/2016

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 509.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
509.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/146525
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 29
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact