The experience of being removed from one's home and the transition to a residential care system pose enormous challenges for a child. Substantial evidence has been found regarding severe developmental effects due to early exposition to extreme psychosocial and affective deprivation. The research on Bowlby's theoretical proposals has highlighted the link between insecure, disorganized and atypical attachment patterns and children both living in foster care facilities and adopted out of those institutions. The goal of this pilot study is to investigate the attachment representation in an Italian sample of children in middle childhood (9-13 years old) who have been removed from their homes. METHOD: Two compared groups of children participated in this study. The first group was composed of 24 Italian children who had been removed from their homes. The second group, considered as the control group, was composed of 35 Italian children who had never been in foster care placement. The quality of children's attachment to their primary caregivers was assessed by the Child Attachment Interview, an innovative semi-structured interview that seeks to bridge the measurement gap identified in middle childhood RESULTS: The children in foster care placement show a higher percentage of insecure and disorganized attachment representations and lower scores on the Child Reflective Functioning Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical implications and enhancements to effective intervention for foster children's caretaking are discussed.

Attachment Representation in Institutionalized Children: A Preliminary Study Using the Child Attachment Interview

CUSSINO, MARTINA;VEGLIA, Fabio;
2015-01-01

Abstract

The experience of being removed from one's home and the transition to a residential care system pose enormous challenges for a child. Substantial evidence has been found regarding severe developmental effects due to early exposition to extreme psychosocial and affective deprivation. The research on Bowlby's theoretical proposals has highlighted the link between insecure, disorganized and atypical attachment patterns and children both living in foster care facilities and adopted out of those institutions. The goal of this pilot study is to investigate the attachment representation in an Italian sample of children in middle childhood (9-13 years old) who have been removed from their homes. METHOD: Two compared groups of children participated in this study. The first group was composed of 24 Italian children who had been removed from their homes. The second group, considered as the control group, was composed of 35 Italian children who had never been in foster care placement. The quality of children's attachment to their primary caregivers was assessed by the Child Attachment Interview, an innovative semi-structured interview that seeks to bridge the measurement gap identified in middle childhood RESULTS: The children in foster care placement show a higher percentage of insecure and disorganized attachment representations and lower scores on the Child Reflective Functioning Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical implications and enhancements to effective intervention for foster children's caretaking are discussed.
2015
22
2
165
175
Attachment; Child Attachment Interview; Institutional Care; Middle Childhood
ZACCAGNINO M.; CUSSINO M.; PREZIOSA A. ; VEGLIA F.; CARASSA .
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Veglia2015Attachment Representation in Institutionalized Children.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 176.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
176.04 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Veglia2015Attachment_4aperto.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 429.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
429.76 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/150347
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 22
social impact