Purpose – The purpose of this study is to provide a rigorous and holistic analysis of the main features of the Japanese accounting environment. It also raises issues related to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Japan. Design/methodology/approach – For the purpose of investigating the Japanese accounting system, this study applies the accounting ecology framework developed by Gernon and Wallace (1995) and provides a content analysis of relevant meetings of the Business Accounting Council of Japan. Findings – The findings of this study provide evidence that it would be problematic to require the adoption of IFRS for all listed companies in Japan. The main reason for this is that the Japanese policymakers and standard-setting bodies follow two objectives: enhancing the international comparability of financial reporting and maintaining institutional complementarity between financial reporting and other infrastructures such as accounting-related laws. Research limitations/implications – This study is relevant for accounting researchers and professionals with an interest in Japanese accounting practices. It is also useful for the International Accounting Standards Board and representatives of countries planning to adopt IFRS in the future. Originality/value – The findings of this study show that contextual issues such as social, organizational and professional environments cannot be ignored in the adoption of IFRS in Japan.

Adoption of IFRS in Japan: challenges and consequences

SCAGNELLI, Simone Domenico
2015-01-01

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to provide a rigorous and holistic analysis of the main features of the Japanese accounting environment. It also raises issues related to the adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Japan. Design/methodology/approach – For the purpose of investigating the Japanese accounting system, this study applies the accounting ecology framework developed by Gernon and Wallace (1995) and provides a content analysis of relevant meetings of the Business Accounting Council of Japan. Findings – The findings of this study provide evidence that it would be problematic to require the adoption of IFRS for all listed companies in Japan. The main reason for this is that the Japanese policymakers and standard-setting bodies follow two objectives: enhancing the international comparability of financial reporting and maintaining institutional complementarity between financial reporting and other infrastructures such as accounting-related laws. Research limitations/implications – This study is relevant for accounting researchers and professionals with an interest in Japanese accounting practices. It is also useful for the International Accounting Standards Board and representatives of countries planning to adopt IFRS in the future. Originality/value – The findings of this study show that contextual issues such as social, organizational and professional environments cannot be ignored in the adoption of IFRS in Japan.
2015
27
1
3
27
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/PAR-11-2012-0056
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS); Japanese accounting system; Japan; financial accounting
Tsunogaya, Noriyuki; Hellmann, Andreas; Scagnelli, Simone Domenico
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Tsunogaya et al., 2015, Adoption of IFRS in Japan- challenges and consequences.PDF

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: fulltext
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 260.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
260.5 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
PAR-11-2012-0056.R3(postprint).pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: postprint
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 346.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
346.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1508681
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact