Buffalo milk is characterized by the presence of all 4 casein fractions (aS1, b, aS2, and k) encoded by the 4 tightly linked autosomal genes (CSN1S1, CSN2, CSN1S2, and CSN3, respectively). In the present paper, we report for the first time a quantitative characterization of buffalo casein transcripts and show that the 4 genes are not transcribed and translated with the same efficiency. In particular, the analysis of individual milk samples obtained from 9 Mediterranean river buffaloes showed that the most abundant casein fractions were b (53.45%) and aS1 (20.61%), followed by asS2 and k, at 14.28 and 11.66%, respectively. Quantification of the corresponding mRNA showed that the percentage of transcripts of the 4 caseins was 16.48, 23.18, 55.87, and 4.47% for aS1, b, aS2, and k, respectively. Translation efficiency was 0.25 for CSN1S2, 1.31 for CSN1S1, 2.39 for CSN2, and 2.69 for the CSN3 transcripts, respectively. A comparison of nucleotide sequences with the Kozak consensus sequence was also carried out to investigate if the mRNA sequences might be responsible for the observed differences.
Translational efficiency of casein transcripts in Mediterranean river buffalo
PAUCIULLO, Alfredo;
2011-01-01
Abstract
Buffalo milk is characterized by the presence of all 4 casein fractions (aS1, b, aS2, and k) encoded by the 4 tightly linked autosomal genes (CSN1S1, CSN2, CSN1S2, and CSN3, respectively). In the present paper, we report for the first time a quantitative characterization of buffalo casein transcripts and show that the 4 genes are not transcribed and translated with the same efficiency. In particular, the analysis of individual milk samples obtained from 9 Mediterranean river buffaloes showed that the most abundant casein fractions were b (53.45%) and aS1 (20.61%), followed by asS2 and k, at 14.28 and 11.66%, respectively. Quantification of the corresponding mRNA showed that the percentage of transcripts of the 4 caseins was 16.48, 23.18, 55.87, and 4.47% for aS1, b, aS2, and k, respectively. Translation efficiency was 0.25 for CSN1S2, 1.31 for CSN1S1, 2.39 for CSN2, and 2.69 for the CSN3 transcripts, respectively. A comparison of nucleotide sequences with the Kozak consensus sequence was also carried out to investigate if the mRNA sequences might be responsible for the observed differences.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
17 - Cosenza et al., 2011.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
93.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
93.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Translational efficiency JDS - ugov.pdf
Open Access dal 02/12/2012
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
809.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
809.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.