After illustrating some theoretical elements that make Croce’s aesthetic a focal point in contemporary aesthetics, in the present article I will show how, given the validity of the first part of Croce’s thesis (i), the second part of his thesis (ii) is not defensible in the terms proposed by him. Finally, on the basis on the previous analyses, I shall offer some arguments in favour of maintaining the disciplinary distinction between aesthetics and philosophy of art.
What Still Stands of Croce's Aesthetic
ANDINA, Tiziana
2015-01-01
Abstract
After illustrating some theoretical elements that make Croce’s aesthetic a focal point in contemporary aesthetics, in the present article I will show how, given the validity of the first part of Croce’s thesis (i), the second part of his thesis (ii) is not defensible in the terms proposed by him. Finally, on the basis on the previous analyses, I shall offer some arguments in favour of maintaining the disciplinary distinction between aesthetics and philosophy of art.
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2014_what still.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
478.76 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
478.76 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
