OBJECTIVE: To verify the safety and clinical use of non-invasive high-voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) in patients with compressive radiculopathy. To test the feasibility of HVES to survey nerve root function during lumbosacral surgery. METHODS: In 20 patients undergoing lumbosacral surgery for degenerative spinal diseases, compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by maximal HVES were bilaterally recorded throughout surgery from L3 to S2 radicular territories. A preliminary study was performed in awake patients to rule out detrimental effects caused by HVES. RESULTS: Preoperative study confirmed the safety of HVES. Unexpectedly, a transient but significant remission of pain was observed after root stimulation. Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) was accomplished in all patients. HVES never hindered surgical procedures and never caused mechanical damage within the operatory field. In 4 patients acute, highly focal and reversible conduction failure was promptly detected by HVES in radicular territories congruent with the root manipulated at that moment. CONCLUSIONS: HVES is a safe and sensitive tool to monitor nerve root function in lumbosacral surgery. SIGNIFICANCE: The method is based on the assumption that any acute conduction failure occurring during surgery can be immediately and unambiguously detected by HVES if root stimulation is supramaximal and delivered rostral to the surgical level.

Non-invasive high voltage electrical stimulation as a monitoring tool of nerve root function in lumbosacral surgery

TEALDI, STEFANO;BENECH, Franco
2013-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To verify the safety and clinical use of non-invasive high-voltage electrical stimulation (HVES) in patients with compressive radiculopathy. To test the feasibility of HVES to survey nerve root function during lumbosacral surgery. METHODS: In 20 patients undergoing lumbosacral surgery for degenerative spinal diseases, compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) evoked by maximal HVES were bilaterally recorded throughout surgery from L3 to S2 radicular territories. A preliminary study was performed in awake patients to rule out detrimental effects caused by HVES. RESULTS: Preoperative study confirmed the safety of HVES. Unexpectedly, a transient but significant remission of pain was observed after root stimulation. Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) was accomplished in all patients. HVES never hindered surgical procedures and never caused mechanical damage within the operatory field. In 4 patients acute, highly focal and reversible conduction failure was promptly detected by HVES in radicular territories congruent with the root manipulated at that moment. CONCLUSIONS: HVES is a safe and sensitive tool to monitor nerve root function in lumbosacral surgery. SIGNIFICANCE: The method is based on the assumption that any acute conduction failure occurring during surgery can be immediately and unambiguously detected by HVES if root stimulation is supramaximal and delivered rostral to the surgical level.
2013
124
4
809
818
Conduction block; Conduction failure; Electrical stimulation; Intraoperative monitoring; Lumbosacral surgery; Nerve root; Action Potentials; Adult; Aged; Anesthesia; Electric Stimulation; Electrodes; Electromyography; Female; Humans; Low Back Pain; Lumbosacral Region; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Motor Neurons; Neuromuscular Junction; Neurosurgical Procedures; Pain Measurement; Preoperative Care; Radiculopathy; Software; Spinal Cord Compression; Spinal Nerve Roots; Neurology (clinical); Neurology; Physiology (medical); Sensory Systems
Troni W; Benech CA; Perez R; Tealdi S; Berardino M; Benech F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Untitled.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: pdf
Dimensione 1.41 MB
Formato Unknown
1.41 MB Unknown Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/152206
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact