Aim: The aim of this split-mouth clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of Apically Positioned Flap with Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery (FibReORS) or Osseous Resective Surgery (ORS) in the treatment of periodontal pockets associated with intrabony defects ≤ 3 mm at posterior natural teeth. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six posterior sextants requiring osseous resective surgery were selected in 13 chronic periodontitis patients: 13 sextants were randomly assigned to ORS and 13 to FibReORS. Clinical evaluation of probing depth (PD), gingival recession and clinical attachment level was performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Periapical radiographs were taken prior and after surgical treatment, at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Results: Ostectomy amounted to 1.0 ± 0.3 mm in the ORS group and to 0.4 ± 0.2 mm in the FibReORS group. At 12-month examination PD changes did not significantly differ between the experimental groups. ORS group showed significantly (p<0.001) greater clinical attachment loss (2.2 ± 1.0 mm versus 1.0 ± 0.6 mm), radiographic bone resorption (0.43 ± 0.08 mm versus 0.13 ± 0.09 mm) and post-operative patient discomfort compared to FibReORS. Conclusion: FibReORS resulted in similar PD reduction, but less ostectomy, clinical attachment loss and patient morbidity compared to ORS.

Osseous resective surgery with and without fibre retention technique in the treatment of shallow intrabony defects: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial

AIMETTI, Mario
First
;
FERRAROTTI, FRANCESCO;ROMANO, Federica
2015-01-01

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this split-mouth clinical trial was to compare the effectiveness of Apically Positioned Flap with Fibre Retention Osseous Resective Surgery (FibReORS) or Osseous Resective Surgery (ORS) in the treatment of periodontal pockets associated with intrabony defects ≤ 3 mm at posterior natural teeth. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six posterior sextants requiring osseous resective surgery were selected in 13 chronic periodontitis patients: 13 sextants were randomly assigned to ORS and 13 to FibReORS. Clinical evaluation of probing depth (PD), gingival recession and clinical attachment level was performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Periapical radiographs were taken prior and after surgical treatment, at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Results: Ostectomy amounted to 1.0 ± 0.3 mm in the ORS group and to 0.4 ± 0.2 mm in the FibReORS group. At 12-month examination PD changes did not significantly differ between the experimental groups. ORS group showed significantly (p<0.001) greater clinical attachment loss (2.2 ± 1.0 mm versus 1.0 ± 0.6 mm), radiographic bone resorption (0.43 ± 0.08 mm versus 0.13 ± 0.09 mm) and post-operative patient discomfort compared to FibReORS. Conclusion: FibReORS resulted in similar PD reduction, but less ostectomy, clinical attachment loss and patient morbidity compared to ORS.
2015
42
2
182
189
www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0303-6979
bone loss; periodontal; periodontal pocket; periodontitis; randomized clinical trial; surgery; Periodontics
Aimetti, Mario; Mariani, Giulia Maria; Ferrarotti, Francesco; Ercoli, Elena; Audagna, Martina; Bignardi, Cristina; Romano, Federica
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
osseous_resective_surgery.pdf

Open Access dal 02/03/2016

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 636.43 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
636.43 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
osseous_resective_surgery_article.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale file editoriale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 166.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
166.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1522425
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact