In this paper I defend the thesis that posthumanism, understood as the set of theories aimed at re-discussing the ordinary concept of “human”, is decisive – both ethically and ontologically – in solving the classic problems regarding the discrimination of forms of “otherness” as different from a prototypical archetype of humanity. The next stage lies in re-examining the foundations of the anthropocentric paradigm that tends to turn “innocent” ontological properties into ethical levels of reality aimed at organizing the world from a social and political point of view.
Il postumano come alternativa alle ontologie divisive
CAFFO, LEONARDO
2015-01-01
Abstract
In this paper I defend the thesis that posthumanism, understood as the set of theories aimed at re-discussing the ordinary concept of “human”, is decisive – both ethically and ontologically – in solving the classic problems regarding the discrimination of forms of “otherness” as different from a prototypical archetype of humanity. The next stage lies in re-examining the foundations of the anthropocentric paradigm that tends to turn “innocent” ontological properties into ethical levels of reality aimed at organizing the world from a social and political point of view.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
postumano divisive in genere.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
122.62 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
122.62 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.