Why did semiotics develop as a discipline that concentrates on the concept of sign, and that sees and interprets the world through this concept? Why was the idea of a science that systematically studies signs welcome in a certain epoch of humanity, and why does it seem so abstruse to most nowadays? Should it be given up, like something that belongs to a remote, vanished past? Or is there something, in semiotics, that still offers answers that no other discipline can provide?
Double Debunking: Modern Divination and the End of Semiotics
LEONE, Massimo
2015-01-01
Abstract
Why did semiotics develop as a discipline that concentrates on the concept of sign, and that sees and interprets the world through this concept? Why was the idea of a science that systematically studies signs welcome in a certain epoch of humanity, and why does it seem so abstruse to most nowadays? Should it be given up, like something that belongs to a remote, vanished past? Or is there something, in semiotics, that still offers answers that no other discipline can provide?
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Massimo Leone 2015 - Double Debunking.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file:
PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione
361.77 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
361.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
