A pre-fattening trial was performed to evaluate the effect of replacement of fishmeal (FM) with insect meal (IM; Tenebrio molitor) on growth performance and survival rate of common catfish (Ameiurus melas). Fingerlings of A. melas (mean body weight 0.248±0.07 g) were randomly distributed over 4 indoor tanks of 2 m3 at a density of 2,000 fish/tank, and kept at a temperature of 23-25 °C in two separated recirculating aquaculture systems. Fish were divided into two groups (two tanks per group): FM and IM. Fish of the FM group were fed with a control diet (51.6% protein and 18.1% lipid), whereas those of the IM group received a diet (50.8% protein and 22.1% lipid) in which 50% of FM was substituted with IM. Chemical parameters (moisture, crude protein, total lipids, ether extract, and ash) and fatty acid profile of the two feeds is reported. The feeding trial lasted 90 days and fish were weighed at the beginning of the trial and then on monthly basis. Growth performance was good in both groups. However, fish of the IM group reached a final mean body weight (4.2±0.6 g) significantly lower (P<0.01) than that of the FM group (5.13±0.7 g). The survival rate of FM group (79%) was higher than that of IM (70%), too. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrated that the diet with insect meal was able to sustain growth in catfish fingerlings but fish fed with FM performed better than those fed with IM.

Growth performance of common catfish (Ameiurus melas Raf.) fingerlings fed Tenebrio molitor meal diet

GASCO, Laura;
2015-01-01

Abstract

A pre-fattening trial was performed to evaluate the effect of replacement of fishmeal (FM) with insect meal (IM; Tenebrio molitor) on growth performance and survival rate of common catfish (Ameiurus melas). Fingerlings of A. melas (mean body weight 0.248±0.07 g) were randomly distributed over 4 indoor tanks of 2 m3 at a density of 2,000 fish/tank, and kept at a temperature of 23-25 °C in two separated recirculating aquaculture systems. Fish were divided into two groups (two tanks per group): FM and IM. Fish of the FM group were fed with a control diet (51.6% protein and 18.1% lipid), whereas those of the IM group received a diet (50.8% protein and 22.1% lipid) in which 50% of FM was substituted with IM. Chemical parameters (moisture, crude protein, total lipids, ether extract, and ash) and fatty acid profile of the two feeds is reported. The feeding trial lasted 90 days and fish were weighed at the beginning of the trial and then on monthly basis. Growth performance was good in both groups. However, fish of the IM group reached a final mean body weight (4.2±0.6 g) significantly lower (P<0.01) than that of the FM group (5.13±0.7 g). The survival rate of FM group (79%) was higher than that of IM (70%), too. In conclusion, the results of this study demonstrated that the diet with insect meal was able to sustain growth in catfish fingerlings but fish fed with FM performed better than those fed with IM.
2015
Inglese
Esperti anonimi
1
3
233
240
8
http://www.wageningenacademic.com/doi/abs/10.3920/JIFF2014.0006
aquaculture, common catfish, insect meal, growth performance, survival rate, Tenebrio molitor
no
1 – prodotto con file in versione Open Access (allegherò il file al passo 5-Carica)
262
4
Roncarati, A.; Gasco, L.; Parisi, G.; Terova, G.
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
partially_open
03-CONTRIBUTO IN RIVISTA::03A-Articolo su Rivista
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JIFF Proofs 8_4_2015.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Growth performances catfish (Roncarati et al 2015).pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 301.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
301.29 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1529845
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 64
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 58
social impact