The Great Recession (GR) creates a stalemate in macroeconomics. On the one hand, standard approaches fail to account for its persistence in a credible way (mainly stress government failures as its deep causes, for example) due to their implicit assumption that the economy is internally stable. On the other, heterodox approaches fail to regain consensus. While often correctly stressing that the roots of the GR lie not only in developments within the financial sector but also in a lack of aggregate demand, they fail to devise an alternative method for showing why this problem has arisen in a systematic way. This paper fills the gap by proposing a new framework called the Balanced Stability Approach. Unlike standard macro, which takes stability for granted, it provides a balanced assessment of stability, considering both positive and problematic aspects of the so-called New Economy (NE), in a broad interdisciplinary perspective. On these grounds, the paper draws the conclusion that the low level of aggregate demand underlying the GR is rooted in a number of wider structural changes generated by the NE.
How can we explain the persistence of the Great Recession? A Balanced Stability Approach
TOGATI, Teodoro
2016-01-01
Abstract
The Great Recession (GR) creates a stalemate in macroeconomics. On the one hand, standard approaches fail to account for its persistence in a credible way (mainly stress government failures as its deep causes, for example) due to their implicit assumption that the economy is internally stable. On the other, heterodox approaches fail to regain consensus. While often correctly stressing that the roots of the GR lie not only in developments within the financial sector but also in a lack of aggregate demand, they fail to devise an alternative method for showing why this problem has arisen in a systematic way. This paper fills the gap by proposing a new framework called the Balanced Stability Approach. Unlike standard macro, which takes stability for granted, it provides a balanced assessment of stability, considering both positive and problematic aspects of the so-called New Economy (NE), in a broad interdisciplinary perspective. On these grounds, the paper draws the conclusion that the low level of aggregate demand underlying the GR is rooted in a number of wider structural changes generated by the NE.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Togati 2016 cje.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
446.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
446.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Togati_CambrJourEc16.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
394.99 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
394.99 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
cJE Togati 2016.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
446.91 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
446.91 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.