Background Microorganism adhesion on polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty is a concern. Many studies have focused on vitamin-E-stabilized ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), whereas first-generation, highly crosslinked UHMWPE, which is the most commonly used in clinical practice, has been scarcely evaluated. Questions/purposes We aimed (1) to compare the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans with virgin (untreated) UHMWPE (PE) and crosslinked UHMWPE (XLPE); (2) to correlate the results with the biomaterial surface properties; and (3) to determine whether the decreased adhesion on vitamin E-stabilized UHMWPE (VE-PE) previously recorded for bacteria can also be confirmed for C albicans. Methods Microbial adhesion of biofilm-producing American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and clinical strains on XLPE and VE-PE were compared with PE at 3, 7, 24, and 48 hours of incubation and quantified, as colony forming units (CFU)/mL, using a sonication protocol. Sample surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness and contact angle measurements, attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to reveal qualitative differences in surface composition and topography that could influence the microbial adhesion. The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and tested by unpaired t-tests. Results All microorganisms, both ATCC and clinical strains, showed lower adhesion (p < 0.05) on XLPE, with adhesion percentages ranging from 18% to 25%, compared with PE, with adhesion percentages ranging from 51% to 55%, after 48 hours. Only the ATCC S epidermidis showed a reduced adhesion profile also after 3 hours (adhesion ratio of 14% on XLPE versus 50% on PE) and 24 hours (19% on XLPE versus 55% on PE) of incubation. ATCC and clinical C albicans were less adherent to XLPE than to PE (p < 0.05) showing adhesion values of 104 CFU/mL and 103 CFU/mL respectively, even at the earlier incubation time points. Roughness and contact angle were 0.8 ± 0.2 m and 92 ± 3°, respectively, with no differences among samples. Qualitative differences in the surface chemical composition were revealed by XPS only. A confirmation of the decreased adhesion on VE-PE respect to PE was also registered here for C albicans strains (p < 0.05). Conclusions Vitamin E stabilization and crosslinking of UHMWPE are capable of reducing microbial adhesion. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of modulation of microbial adhesion to medical-grade UHMWPE. Clinical Relevance Our results suggest that VE-PE and XLPE may have an added benefit of being more resistant to bacterial adhesion, even fungal strains.
Do Crosslinking and Vitamin E Stabilization Influence Microbial Adhesions on UHMWPE-based Biomaterials?
BANCHE, GiulianaFirst
;BRACCO, Pierangiola;ALLIZOND, VALERIA;BOFFANO, MICHELE;CIMINO, ANDREA;BRACH DEL PREVER, Elena Maria;CUFFINI, AnnamariaLast
2015-01-01
Abstract
Background Microorganism adhesion on polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty is a concern. Many studies have focused on vitamin-E-stabilized ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), whereas first-generation, highly crosslinked UHMWPE, which is the most commonly used in clinical practice, has been scarcely evaluated. Questions/purposes We aimed (1) to compare the adherence of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Candida albicans with virgin (untreated) UHMWPE (PE) and crosslinked UHMWPE (XLPE); (2) to correlate the results with the biomaterial surface properties; and (3) to determine whether the decreased adhesion on vitamin E-stabilized UHMWPE (VE-PE) previously recorded for bacteria can also be confirmed for C albicans. Methods Microbial adhesion of biofilm-producing American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and clinical strains on XLPE and VE-PE were compared with PE at 3, 7, 24, and 48 hours of incubation and quantified, as colony forming units (CFU)/mL, using a sonication protocol. Sample surfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, roughness and contact angle measurements, attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and Xray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) to reveal qualitative differences in surface composition and topography that could influence the microbial adhesion. The results were analyzed by descriptive statistics and tested by unpaired t-tests. Results All microorganisms, both ATCC and clinical strains, showed lower adhesion (p < 0.05) on XLPE, with adhesion percentages ranging from 18% to 25%, compared with PE, with adhesion percentages ranging from 51% to 55%, after 48 hours. Only the ATCC S epidermidis showed a reduced adhesion profile also after 3 hours (adhesion ratio of 14% on XLPE versus 50% on PE) and 24 hours (19% on XLPE versus 55% on PE) of incubation. ATCC and clinical C albicans were less adherent to XLPE than to PE (p < 0.05) showing adhesion values of 104 CFU/mL and 103 CFU/mL respectively, even at the earlier incubation time points. Roughness and contact angle were 0.8 ± 0.2 m and 92 ± 3°, respectively, with no differences among samples. Qualitative differences in the surface chemical composition were revealed by XPS only. A confirmation of the decreased adhesion on VE-PE respect to PE was also registered here for C albicans strains (p < 0.05). Conclusions Vitamin E stabilization and crosslinking of UHMWPE are capable of reducing microbial adhesion. Further studies are needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms of modulation of microbial adhesion to medical-grade UHMWPE. Clinical Relevance Our results suggest that VE-PE and XLPE may have an added benefit of being more resistant to bacterial adhesion, even fungal strains.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
CORR_2015.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
828.2 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
828.2 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
CORR_Banche 2015_4aperto.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
434.38 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
434.38 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.