This article studies two participatory processes that were carried out in Genoa about the strongly contested projects of a motorway and a waste incinerator. It shows how participatory processes may contrib-ute to the de-escalation of the conflict even when stakeholders are not able to reach an agreement. In both cases participatory processes favoured the development of win-win solutions deriving from various form of coordination that took place without reaching an agreement involving citizens committees and environmental groups. Several innovations in the motorway project that reduced the nega-tive externalities for residents were introduced through unilateral ad-justments by the proponents after the conclusion of the process. The project for a new less polluting waste facility came out from a negotia-tion among technicians with different orientations, even if none of them was entitled to represent the organized opponents. At the same time in both cases the opponents did not delegitimize the processes during their implementation. In fact the main actors were connected by a field of relations that nobody had the interest to break. In the case of the motorway the network was promoted by the commission that managed the participatory process through an ex-change of resources (information/legitimation). In the case of the in-cinerator it was promoted by the municipal administration trough an enlargement of the issue at stake.
Anche senza accordo: processi inclusivi e trasformazione dei conflitti territoriali
POMATTO, GIANFRANCO
2013-01-01
Abstract
This article studies two participatory processes that were carried out in Genoa about the strongly contested projects of a motorway and a waste incinerator. It shows how participatory processes may contrib-ute to the de-escalation of the conflict even when stakeholders are not able to reach an agreement. In both cases participatory processes favoured the development of win-win solutions deriving from various form of coordination that took place without reaching an agreement involving citizens committees and environmental groups. Several innovations in the motorway project that reduced the nega-tive externalities for residents were introduced through unilateral ad-justments by the proponents after the conclusion of the process. The project for a new less polluting waste facility came out from a negotia-tion among technicians with different orientations, even if none of them was entitled to represent the organized opponents. At the same time in both cases the opponents did not delegitimize the processes during their implementation. In fact the main actors were connected by a field of relations that nobody had the interest to break. In the case of the motorway the network was promoted by the commission that managed the participatory process through an ex-change of resources (information/legitimation). In the case of the in-cinerator it was promoted by the municipal administration trough an enlargement of the issue at stake.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
