In their 2002 seminal paper Hauser, Chomsky and Fitch hypothesize that recursion is the only human-specific and language-specific mechanism of the faculty of language. While debate focused primarily on the meaning of recursion in the hypothesis and on the human-specific and syntax-specific character of recursion, the present work focuses on the claim that recursion is language-specific. We argue that there are recursive structures in the domain of motor intentionality by way of extending John R. Searle’s analysis of intentional action. We then discuss evidence from cognitive science and neuroscience supporting the claim that motor-intentional recursion is language-independent and suggest some explanatory hypotheses: 1) linguistic recursion is embodied in sensory-motor processing; 2) linguistic and motor-intentional recursions are distinct and mutually independent mechanisms. Finally, we propose some reflections about the epistemic status of HCF as presenting an empirically falsifiable hypothesis , and on the possibility of testing recursion in different cognitive domains.

Is recursion language-specific? Evidence of recursive mechanisms in the structure of intentional action

VICARI, GIUSEPPE;ADENZATO, Mauro
2014-01-01

Abstract

In their 2002 seminal paper Hauser, Chomsky and Fitch hypothesize that recursion is the only human-specific and language-specific mechanism of the faculty of language. While debate focused primarily on the meaning of recursion in the hypothesis and on the human-specific and syntax-specific character of recursion, the present work focuses on the claim that recursion is language-specific. We argue that there are recursive structures in the domain of motor intentionality by way of extending John R. Searle’s analysis of intentional action. We then discuss evidence from cognitive science and neuroscience supporting the claim that motor-intentional recursion is language-independent and suggest some explanatory hypotheses: 1) linguistic recursion is embodied in sensory-motor processing; 2) linguistic and motor-intentional recursions are distinct and mutually independent mechanisms. Finally, we propose some reflections about the epistemic status of HCF as presenting an empirically falsifiable hypothesis , and on the possibility of testing recursion in different cognitive domains.
2014
26
1
169
188
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810014000555
Recursion; Intentional action; Communicative intention
Giuseppe Vicari; Mauro Adenzato
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ADENZATO2014Is recursion.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 337.52 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
337.52 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Vicari&Adenzato_C&C_2014.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 587.92 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
587.92 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/154505
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact